Held that as notice for reopening of assessment u/s 148 was not served, within the time stipulated u/s 149, reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 147 is untenable in law
SC Held that mere acceptance of the rent by the landlord after the expiry of the period of lease would not amount to waiver of the termination of lease.
A notice was given on the website, which is not sufficient, and a personal notice has to be given before cancellation of the GST registration. Therefore, the Court can invoke its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Held that as the agreement between the parties provided for a ‘non-binding’ arbitration, there was absolutely no intention of the parties to enter into an arbitration agreement and that the said agreement could not be termed as an arbitration agreement.
HC Held that the provisional attachment of the bank account is not maintainable once search under Section 67 has been concluded and the department is said to be in the process of proceedings to take Section 74 of the CGST Act.
ITAT Held that discount on issue of ESOP is allowable as deduction under the head Profits & Gains of Business or Profession.
Mere typographical error of the account number of the bank account does not mean that the assessee has not disclosed proper information about the bank account details. Addition u/s 69A unsustainable
As per mercantile system of accounting, provision for expenses is an ascertained liability and the same is eligible for deduction while computing total income.
Held that assessee had failed to satisfy the conditions precedent to claim as revenue expenditure, as the expenditure was incurred during the previous year relevant to the assessment year under consideration. Therefore, the claim cannot be allowed as deduction
Held that impugned expenditure cannot be held to be capital and it is not in the nature of personal expenditure or for any violation of law. Disallowance of CSR expenditure unjustified.
