Jharkhand High Court held that unadjusted TDS amount under Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act is allowed to be migrated under Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Gujarat High Court held that order passed cancelling GST registration without mentioning the reason for said cancellation is non-speaking and cryptic in nature.
Bombay High Court held that proceedings that are not concluded within a reasonable period cannot be carried forwards after an inordinate delay.
ITAT Mumbai held that long term capital loss arising out of the sale of shares and units of mutual funds on which STT was paid and covered under section 10(38) could not be set off against long-term capital gain arising out of the sale of land as per section 70(3) of the Act.
ITAT Delhi held that as payment of rent and common area maintenance charges is made to distinct entities/ companies, TDS @10% u/s 194-I is deductible in case of payment of rent and TDS @2% u/s 194C is deductible in case of payment of Common Area Maintenance charges.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition u/s 68 for investment in joint venture unsustainable as assessee has duly discharged the onus and given all the necessary documents for the identity, genuineness and creditworthiness of the parties.
ITAT Mumbai held that assessee is entitled to raise the additional legal submissions and also additional claims before the appellate authorities. Accordingly, appellate authorities have jurisdiction to entertain the new claim.
NCLAT, Delhi held that adjudicating authority being the appointing authority of IRP/RP has due jurisdiction to pass an order for removal of the Resolution Professional.
CESTAT Delhi held that wrong classification of goods or claiming of ineligible exemption notification doesn’t amount to mis-declaration or mis-statement.
Bombay High Court held that CBDT Guidelines dated 14th June 2019 prescribing time limit for application for compounding of offence is contrary to provisions of section 279(2) of the Income Tax Act.
