Gujarat High Court held that it would not be appropriate to invoke its extraordinary discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in the present case involving possession and control of assets with corporate debtor during liquidation.
Madras High Court held that the matter involving sexual harassment complaint against IRS officer needs a fresh inquiry. Accordingly, High Court directs Internal Complaints Committee [ICC] to be re-constituted. Further, High Court also issued a series of directions for conduct of inquiry.
Delhi High Court held that Indian Institution providing educational consultation to students in India and Foreign Educational Institution paying commission thereof cannot be considered as intermediary service. Accordingly, writ petition of revenue dismissed.
Rajasthan High Court modifies bail condition with regard to foreign travel to petitioner involved in alleged tax evasion of Rs. 8.75 crores. Accordingly, the petitioner is allowed to travel abroad with prior information taking note of no flight risk.
ITAT Delhi held that reopening of assessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act on the basis of stale information results into change of opinion and the same is not sustainable in law. Accordingly, appeal is allowed and reopening is quashed.
Chhattisgarh High Court held that petition seeking release/reimbursement of GST cannot be entertained since relief of compensations sought is contingent upon the resolution of the disputed question of facts raised, and these questions cannot be adjudicated under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Kerala High Court held that appellate authority to adopt liberal view and accept document since appropriate opportunity not granted by adjudicating authority to produce documents. Accordingly, writ disposed of and matter remanded back.
ITAT Mumbai held that transfer pricing adjustment in relation to international transaction of payment of bareboat charter hire fees is directed to be deleted since benchmarking approach of assessee is already accepted by DRP in earlier years.
Delhi High Court held that order is liable to be set aside and matter remanded to ITAT since ITAT failed to provide appropriate reasoning with regard to functionality of comparable while undertaking transfer pricing adjustment.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition on account of section 14A of the Income Tax Act while computing books profit under section 115JB of the Income Tax Act is not justifiable. Accordingly, addition u/s. 14A deleted and appeal of assessee allowed.
