NCLAT Delhi held that order holding Successful Resolution Applicant as ineligible is wholly erroneous and unsustainable since SRA duly satisfied all the of CIRP Regulations. Accordingly, impugned order is quashed and set aside.
ITAT Jaipur held that approval granted under section 153D in a mechanical and consolidated manner without due application of mind is invalid. Accordingly, assessment orders framed under section 153A cannot be sustained.
Karnataka High Court held that IGST wrongly paid to Centre on intra-state supplies is required to be refunded back since CGST/SGST already paid to the State GST Authorities. Accordingly, petition is allowed and order rejecting refund claim set aside.
Gujarat High Court held that detention order is liable to be quashed and set aside since department failed to issue notice as required under section 129(3) of the GST Act. Accordingly, writ is disposed of.
Kerala High Court held that the excess GST liability pertaining to the transactions relating to the contract is question needs to be reimbursed to the petitioner as per the terms and conditions stated in the contract. Accordingly, writ allowed to that extent.
Bombay High Court held that passing of impugned order denying rebate claim under rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules without dealing with crucial issues and without considering the submissions is not justifiable. Accordingly, order is set aside and matter is remanded back.
NCLAT Delhi held that NCLT erred by not enforcing valid Family Settlement Agreement since such agreement is binding and enforceable for resolving family company disputes which involves oppression and management.
High Court refused to entertain a writ petition challenging a GST demand involving alleged fraudulent ITC, holding that disputed facts must be resolved through the statutory appeal process.
Gujarat High Court held that interest under section 50 of the GST Act cannot be levied from the date of deposit of the amount in electronic cash ledger till the time the return in Form GSTR3B is submitted. Accordingly, petition is allowed.
CESTAT Delhi held that import of parts of e-rikshaw cannot be presumed to be import of an e-rikshaw in complete knocked-down/semi knocked-down [CKD/SKD] condition as three essential components were not imported. Accordingly, demand set aside.
