Delhi High Court held that the insertion of second proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act is declaratory and curative in nature and has retrospective effect from 1st April 2005. Petition dismissed in view that appeal doesn’t bear any substantial question of law.
ITAT Mumbai held that were the co-operative society receives/earns the interest on deposits with the co-operative bank is eligible for claim of deduction under Section 80(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act.
Punjab and Haryana High Court held that addition under section 69 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained investment unsustainable as nature and source of the investment duly explained.
Andra Pradesh High Court dismissed the writ petition preferred against show cause notice in Form GST DRC-01 as the petitioner is required to approach the authority which has issued the notice and file the necessary objections with evidence.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition u/s. 68 of the Income Tax Act towards unexplained cash credit unsustainable as the addition was made by AO on the basis of presumptions and conjectures and without conducting any independent investigation.
CESTAT Bangalore held that destruction of obsolete goods allowed to EOU on payment of duty on scrap value. Accordingly, held that when goods are destroyed EOU is not liable to pay duty on original value at the time of import.
Kerala High Court held that Municipality cannot grant remission of the property tax in absence of valid advance notice, as required under sub-section (3) of section 239 of the Kerala Municipality Act, to the Secretary for claiming remission of property tax in respect of the building that is vacant or which would be vacant from a particular date.
ITAT Visakhapatnam held that cooperative society is eligible for deduction U/s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act on the interest income received from investment in banks.
Orissa High Court held that order passed under Section 254 (2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be construed to be an order within the meaning of Section 260A to make it appealable before this Court.
ITAT Delhi held that the pass through cost to the extent which are directly relatable to third parties, namely, advertisement and publicity; business promotion and participation in trade events are to be excluded from the cost base.
