ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition under section 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Income Tax Act without referring valuations of property to DVO as per the provisions of sec-50C of the Income Tax Act is liable to be deleted. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
ITAT Mumbai held that issue of approval under section 80G of the Income Tax Act is liable to be restored back to CIT(E) since fresh application in Form 10AB is already pending for adjudication.
NCLAT Delhi held that in case there is fraudulent and malicious initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Proceedings [CIRP], adjudicating authority has jurisdiction under the IBC to recall CIRP admission order.
ITAT Bangalore held that merely because the assessee has failed to prove any benefit from services received the disallowance of transfer pricing cannot be made. Accordingly, one more opportunity granted to assessee to prove the case.
ITAT Jaipur held that addition towards unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act merely based on retracted statement cannot be sustained. Accordingly, appeal of the revenue dismissed.
ITAT Jodhpur held that addition of income and capital gain tax levied thereon is liable to be set aside as land not situated within the municipal limits of Sardarsahar. Accordingly, appeal of the assessee allowed.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that agreement for transfer of operations, management and movable assets didn’t violated the purpose of charity and hence exemption under section 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act duly available.
NCLAT Chennai held that appeal u/s. 60(5) of I&B Code, 2016 against order rejecting interlocutory application for seeking to declare the process memorandum for Resolution Plan incomplete is hereby allowed.
NCLAT Delhi held that the commercial wisdom of the Committee of Creditors [CoC] in rejecting resolution plan and opting for liquidation is non-justiciable. Accordingly, held that NCLT rightly refused to intervene in decision of CoC.
Kerala High Court held that revision proceedings under section 263 of the Income Tax Act righty invoked as claim was accepted by assessing officer without any enquiry. Accordingly, jurisdiction rightly invoked.
