CESTAT Delhi held that imported parts being all parts of Juniper router are cannot be classified as Network Interface Card hence are classifiable under CTI 8517 70 90 as contended by appellant and not under CTI 8517 62 90 as contended by department.
NCLAT Delhi held that Resolution Professional is required to take control and custody of any assets for which the Corporate Debtor has ownership right including the assets that may or may not be in possession of the Corporate Debtor. Thus, section 18(1) of IBC enables resolution profession to repossess shares held in any subsidiaries of Corporate Debtor.
NCLAT Delhi held that withdrawal of first notice via second notice under Sec.13(2) of the SARFAESI Act doesn’t invalidate the effect of the recovery certificate which the DRT has passed. Accordingly, PIRP was laid in time and hence appeals are allowed.
Allahabad High Court held that bank not permitted to unilaterally reduce interest rates on Fixed Deposit Receipt [FDR] after issuance of the FDRs. Accordingly, these petitions are allowed and bank is directed to compute interest on FDRs at originally contracted rates.
Calcutta High Court held that marking of company with ‘management dispute’ by ROC has nothing to do with transaction of the company with its banker. Hence, freezing of bank account based on the same is unlawful.
Telangana High Court held that the income derived from tissue culture operations by the assessee qualifies as agricultural income and hence exempted from tax under Section 10(1) of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, the present writ stands allowed.
Calcutta High Court held that the mandate laid down under Section 19 of the PMLA has been complied with by the arresting officer in effecting arrest of the petitioner. Accordingly, arrest cannot be said to be vitiated for non-compliance of the same. Thus, writ petition is dismissed.
Himachal Pradesh High Court held that bail in scholarship scam case liable to be granted since there is no chance of commencement and conclusion of trial in near further and twin conditions as per section 45 of PMLA satisfied. Accordingly, bail application allowed.
CESTAT Chandigarh held that suspension of customs broker license is liable to be quashed since timelines to be adhered by the officers while suspending or revoking the license of the Customs Broker as prescribed under CBLR, 2018 are not followed.
Allahabad High Court held that toll plaza receipts not mandatory for justifying actual physical movement of goods since e-way bill and tax invoice duly produced. Accordingly, order not justified in the eyes of law.
