The plaintiff entity is a company engaged in the business of constructing and redeveloping immovable properties, either on a contractual or collaborative basis, and subsequently selling such properties.
CESTAT Chennai held that cess levied on export of Shrimp and Prawns was unlawful and since the element of Agricultural Produce Cess paid on the export of Prawns and Shrimps was not passed, refund of the same is eligible.
ITAT Nagpur held that addition towards unexplained expenditure u/s. 69C of the Income Tax Act not warranted since the same are already covered in declaration of income hence no separate additions warranted.
NCLAT Delhi held that lease hold rights are assets of Corporate Debtor hence termination of the same by GIDC is in violation of section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Thus, appeal filed by Resolution Professional deserves to be allowed.
CESTAT Kolkata held that ‘Works Rolls’ are Capital Goods and not spare parts and hence eligible to be imported against full utilization of Status Holder Incentive Scheme [SHIS Scheme]. Accordingly, appeal of assessee allowed.
ITAT Mumbai held that alternative claim of assessee (lessee) to allow depreciation on Finance Lease Rental Payment is allowable since lessor is allowed deduction of the same under section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act.
Bombay High Court held that Court cannot exercise its discretionary jurisdiction to restrain income tax officers from proceedings with assessment proceedings where huge unaccounted income in accommodation entry has been detected.
Madras High Court held that advocates shall maintain professional integrity and do not engage in acts that could mislead the public or undermine the legal profession. Court ordered detailed enquiry regarding a fake law firm operated by a non-advocate.
Supreme Court held that as there was no privity of contract between the concerned parties therein, no ‘deficiency’ would arise and the action (complaint) would not be maintainable before the concerned Consumer Forum.
NCLT Mumbai approved resolution plan of Corporate Debtor [Cane Agro Energy (India) Ltd] as submitted by resolution applicant [M/s. Raigaon Sugar & Power Ltd.] as resolution plan meets requirements of section 30(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
