Himachal Pradesh High Court held that since order passed under section 148A(d) of the Income Tax is bereft of any cogent or plausible reasons the same is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, matter remanded back to AO to decide afresh.
Bombay High Court held that in compulsory purchase order declaration of abrogation was not barred by virtue of section 269-UH and/ or section 293 of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, order passed by Single Judge not sustainable.
Supreme Court held that no priority of interest can be claimed by the Secured Creditors against the properties attached under Maharashtra Protection of Investors and Depositors Act, 1999 [the MPID Act].
Delhi High Court held that Larger Bench of Delhi High Court will decide the whether provisions of section 149(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act inserted by virtue of the Finance Act, 2012 will be applicable retrospectively in concluded assessment.
ITAT Jaipur held that addition under section 68 towards cash deposit in bank as unexplained cannot be sustained since source of cash deposited duly explained. Accordingly, addition of around Rs. 8.60 Crores deleted.
Delhi High Court held that IT/ITeS would fall within the definition of ‘Industrial Building’ as envisaged under Bye-law 9(e) of DMC Property Tax bye-law 2004 and therefore, demand of property tax rightly set aside.
Madras High Court held that block assessment order passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 158BC of the Income Tax Act has been passed within the period prescribed u/s. 158BE(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act and hence not barred by limitation.
NCLAT Delhi held that where Notice under Section 13(2) of SARFAESI Act, 2002 makes a demand as per the Guarantee Agreement between the parties, the Notice has to be treated as notice for invocation of Personal Guarantee.
ITAT Raipur held that assessment framed under section 144 of the Income Tax Act by Additional CIT in absence of order under section 127 and order under section 120(4)(b) is invalid as without having valid assumption of jurisdiction.
ITAT Hyderabad directs AO to reassess Satyam Computer Services [Now, Tech Mahindra Limited] for the Assessment Year 2003-2004 to 2008-2009 in light of the judgement of Hon’ble High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.
