ITAT Mumbai held that trade receivable shown as net of provision for doubtful debts would not be hit by section 115JB(i) of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, addition of provision of bad and doubtful debts to book profits computed u/s. 115JB not sustained.
The present petitions were filed challenging the impugned order dated 28thApril, 2025 passed by the High Court at Calcutta. The issue pertains to release of the goods which were seized by the police after registration of First Information Report.
Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition and imposed cost of Rs. 50,000/- for non-participating in proceedings relating to utilization of inadmissible ITC received from non-existent firm. Further, petitioner is directed to avail appellate remedy.
Madras High Court directs petitioner to produce necessary documents proving that work contract has been completed prior to notification no. 03/2022- Central Tax (Rate) dated 13.07.2022 changing the rate of tax from 12% to 18%. Accordingly, writ disposed of.
ITAT Bangalore held that revisionary proceeding by PCIT under section 263 of the Income tax Act treating assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to interest of revenue upheld since assessee could not demonstrate that the equipment’s were received on returnable basis.
Calcutta High Court held that petitioner/ buyer cannot be saddled with tax component for failure on the part of BSNL/ supplier. Accordingly, BSNL authorities are accordingly directed to pay the same and writ petition is disposed of.
Delhi High Court held that writ petition not entertained as matter related to fraudulent availment of Input Tax Credit [ITC]. Accordingly, petitioner directed to avail appellate remedy and file an appeal u/s. 107 of CGST Act.
ITAT Rajkot held that appellate authorities have power to entertain fresh claim and accordingly, claim of erroneously addition to computation of income accepted and direction given to AO to determine taxable income of assessee afresh.
ITAT Delhi following the decision of Delhi HC in assessee’s own case held that profit earned on sale/redemption of investment is not chargeable to tax. Accordingly, appeal allowed to that extent.
ITAT Chennai held that the amount gifted by the brother cannot be treated as unexplained. Accordingly, addition u/s. 69 of the Income Tax Act deleted to that extent. In the result, the appeal is partly allowed.
