Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dhanasekaran Ramasamy Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dhanasekaran Ramasamy Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) ITAT Chennai held that the amount gifted by the brother cannot be treated as unexplained. Accordingly, addition u/s. 69 of the Income Tax Act deleted to that extent. In the result, the appeal is partly allowed. Facts- The assessee is an individual and did not file the return of income for AY 2013-14. AO received an information from the office of the DIT (I & CI) Salem that the assessee has contributed an amount of Rs. 74,35,000/- as his share in the purchase of two properties on behalf of the partnership firm M/s Madhuraj Associates in which asse...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930