Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Goods and Services Tax

AAR Karnataka Clarifies GST on Artificial Turf and Sports Flooring

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 6773
Case Name
In re New Horizon Development Company Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka)
Appeal Number
Premium Access
Date of Judgement/Order
Premium Access
Subscribe to download.

Already Upgraded? Log in.

Advertisement

In re New Horizon Development Company Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka)

The Karnataka Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) has issued a decision regarding the GST treatment of artificial turf and sports flooring supplied by M/s New Horizon Development Company Private Limited. The company, which offers both the standalone sale of these products and their installation, sought clarification on the applicable Harmonized System of Nomenclature (HSN) codes and corresponding GST rates for both scenarios. The ruling distinguishes between the “pure supply” of goods and a “works contract” involving both supply and installation, outlining different tax liabilities for each business model.

For the pure supply of goods—specifically artificial turf, artificial grass, and other sports flooring—the AAR determined the products fall under Chapter Heading 5703 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. This classification, which covers “carpets and other textile floor coverings (including turf), tufted,” is supported by explanatory notes that explicitly include artificial turf used for sports surfaces. The ruling concluded that the pure supply of these products is subject to a GST rate of 12%, as specified under Entry No. 144 of Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate).

The second part of the ruling addressed the more complex scenario of a works contract, where the company not only supplies the materials but also installs them. The AAR classified this activity as a “composite supply of works contract” under SAC 9954, which pertains to construction services. The authority referenced Section 2(119) of the CGST Act, 2017, which defines a works contract as a service involving the transfer of goods in the execution of a contract for the construction, installation, or alteration of any immovable property. The AAR reasoned that because the artificial turf is attached to the ground with adhesive, it becomes part of an immovable property, thereby fulfilling the definition of a works contract.

Want to Read the Complete Judgment?

You have read the free case summary. Unlock the full judgment, the detailed judicial reasoning and the downloadable PDF, along with every other premium judgment on TaxGuru.

Read on with Premium
Goes straight to payment. GST invoice included.

One subscription covers the entire premium judgment library, not just this case.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: Graduate, CA in Job / Business, DD
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 24,178

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.