Reassessment was valid where audit objections could qualify as “Information” u/s 148A

ITO Vs Mahogany Logistics Services Private Ltd (Madras High Court)

Conclusion: Reassessment proceedings could not be sustained in respect of other issues raised in the audit except in respect of two specific expenditure heads: processing charges and professional fees as the same could be treated as “information” under Section 148A.

Held: Assessee-company had filed a writ petition challenging the reassessment proceedings initiated for the assessment year 2017–18. The company argued that it had already undergone a scrutiny assessment und

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.