Summary: Section 34 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 governs the appointment and powers of a liquidator when a corporate debtor enters liquidation. Initially, the resolution professional (RP) appointed during the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) automatically transitioned to liquidator. However, amendments in 2018 and 2021 introduced key changes. Now, under Section 34(1), the RP can only be appointed as liquidator upon submitting written consent to the Adjudicating Authority. This amendment also extended the provision to cases under the pre-packaged insolvency resolution process (PPIRP). If consent is not provided or specific grounds under Section 34(4) arise (like non-compliance, IBBI recommendations, or refusal to consent), the Authority may appoint another insolvency professional. Sections 34(2)–(3) vest all management powers in the liquidator and require full cooperation from the corporate debtor’s personnel. Provisions also empower the Adjudicating Authority to seek IBBI’s assistance in nominating a new liquidator (Section 34(5)-(7)) and stipulate a regulated fee structure tied to estate value (Section 34(8)-(9)). Collectively, Section 34 creates a transparent, conditional framework for appointing liquidators, ensuring liquidation processes are professionally managed, impartial, and time-bound.
Section 34 – Appointment of Liquidator and transfer of Management Powers
Section 34 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016 deals with the appointment and powers of the liquidator when a corporate debtor goes into liquidation.
Section-34(1)- Appointment of Liquidator
Section 34(1) of the IBC was amended by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Second Amendment) Act, 2018 (Act No. 26 of 2018), which was enacted on 17 August 2018 with retrospective effect from 6 June 2018. The amendment substituted the phrase “Chapter II shall” with “Chapter II shall, subject to submission of a written consent by the resolution professional to the Adjudicating Authority in the specified form,” thereby making the resolution professional’s written consent a prerequisite for appointment as a liquidator.
Pursuant to the said amendment, Section 34(1) reads as under:
“Where the Adjudicating Authority passes an order for liquidation of the corporate debtor under section 33, the resolution professional appointed for the corporate insolvency resolution process under Chapter II shall act as the liquidator for the purposes of liquidation unless replaced by the Adjudicating Authority under sub-section (4).
After said amendment, Section 34(1) reads as under:
“Where the Adjudicating Authority passes an order for liquidation of the corporate debtor under section 33, the resolution professional appointed for the corporate insolvency resolution process under Chapter II shall, subject to submission of a written consent by the resolution professional to the Adjudicatory Authority in specified form act as the liquidator for the purposes of liquidation unless replaced by the Adjudicating Authority under sub-section (4).
The primary purpose of the amendment to Section 34(1) was to ensure that a resolution professional (RP) is appointed as a liquidator only after giving written consent to take up the role. This change introduced a formal requirement of consent before the RP can be appointed by the Adjudicating Authority as the liquidator in the event of liquidation. Earlier, there was an automatic transition of the RP to liquidator upon commencement of liquidation. This amendment prevented automatic appointment and introduced an explicit opt-in process. The amendment ensured that the person taking over the role of liquidator is willing, aware, and ready to assume the duties and responsibilities under Chapter III of the Code.
Section 34(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was further amended by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2021 (Act No. 26 of 2021), which was enacted on 11 August 2021, with retrospective effect from 4 April 2021. Through this amendment, the words “or for the pre-packaged insolvency resolution process under Chapter III-A” were inserted, thereby extending the applicability of Section 34(1) to cases initiated under the newly introduced pre-packaged insolvency resolution process (PPIRP).
After said amendment, Section 34(1) reads as under:
“Where the Adjudicating Authority passes an order for liquidation of the corporate debtor under section 33, the resolution professional appointed for the corporate insolvency resolution process under Chapter II or for the pre-packaged insolvency resolution process under Chapter III-A shall, subject to submission of a written consent by the resolution professional to the Adjudicatory Authority in specified form act as the liquidator for the purposes of liquidation unless replaced by the Adjudicating Authority under sub-section (4).”
The purpose of this amendment was to integrate the PPIRP into the existing insolvency framework. The amendment ensured that Section 34(1) (which deals with the appointment of liquidator) would also apply in cases where a PPIRP fails and liquidation is initiated. Since PPIRP was introduced primarily for MSMEs, this amendment helped ensure that liquidation procedures for failed PPIRPs are seamlessly governed under Section 34(1), like in regular CIRP.
While Section 34(1) provides that the Resolution Professional (RP) shall act as the Liquidator upon the initiation of liquidation under Section 33, this is subject to two conditions:
1. Submission of written consent in the prescribed form (Form AA); and
2. The provision of Section 34(4) — i.e., “unless replaced by the Adjudicating Authority”.
The default rule is that the RP becomes the liquidator. However, this default position can be overridden if:
- The RP’s written consent is not filed.
- The Adjudicating Authority is directed by IBBI or has other reasons under Section 34(4) to replace the RP.
Thus, appointment under Section 34(1) is not automatic or absolute, but conditional and subject to judicial discretion under Section 34(4).
Section-34(2)- Vesting of Management and Powers in the Liquidator.
Upon the appointment of a liquidator under Section 34(1)—usually the Resolution Professional, unless replaced—all powers previously exercised by the Board of Directors, Key Managerial Personnel (KMPs), and Partners (in the case of LLPs or partnerships) cease to have effect and are fully vested in the liquidator. From that point onward, the liquidator becomes the sole authority responsible for managing the affairs, assets, and operations of the corporate debtor throughout the liquidation process.
Bare Text of Section 34(2) – IBC-
“(2) On the appointment of a liquidator under this section, all powers of the board of directors, key managerial personnel and the partners of the corporate debtor, as the case may be, shall cease to have effect and shall be vested in the liquidator.”
Section 34(2) ensures complete control of the corporate debtor shifts to the liquidator so that liquidation is carried out independently, efficiently, and without interference from former management or promoters.
Section-34(3)- Duty of Personnel to assist the Liquidator
The personnel of the corporate debtor are required to provide full assistance and cooperation to the liquidator as needed for managing the affairs of the corporate debtor. The provisions of Section 19, which mandate cooperation during the CIRP, shall also apply to the voluntary liquidation process—with necessary modifications. Specifically, all references to the interim resolution professional in Section 19 shall be interpreted as references to the liquidator during voluntary liquidation.
Bare Text of Section 34(3) – IBC-
“(3) The personnel of the corporate debtor shall extend all assistance and cooperation to the liquidator as may be required by him in managing the affairs of the corporate debtor and provisions of section 19 shall apply in relation to voluntary liquidation process as they apply in relation to liquidation process with the substitution of references to the liquidator for references to the interim resolution professional.”
The purpose of Section 34(3) is to ensure effective cooperation between the personnel of the corporate debtor (such as employees, management, and officers) and the liquidator during the liquidation process, including voluntary liquidation. This section makes it clear that the same standard of cooperation applies to both compulsory liquidation and voluntary liquidation, thereby maintaining consistency in the Code.
It is important to highlight that Section 19(2) of IBC which addresses non-cooperation by the personnel of the corporate debtor—applies specifically to the CIRP and not directly to the liquidation process. However, Section 34(3) extends the applicability of Section 19 to the voluntary liquidation process, with necessary modifications. In particular, references to the “interim resolution professional” in Section 19 are deemed to refer to the “liquidator” for the purpose of voluntary liquidation.
As a result, during voluntary liquidation, the liquidator is empowered to invoke Section 19(2) and seek appropriate directions from the Adjudicating Authority in cases where the personnel of the corporate debtor fail to provide the required assistance or cooperation.
In contrast, no such express provision applies in the context of compulsory liquidation under Section 33. In such cases, the liquidator must rely on the general powers conferred under Section 35 and may approach the Adjudicating Authority for necessary directions through appropriate applications, in the event of obstruction or non-cooperation by the corporate debtor’s personnel.
Section-34(4)- Replacement of Resolution Professional by Adjudicating Authority
Section 34(4) was amended by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Second Amendment) Act, 2018 (Act No. 26 of 2018), which was enacted on 17 August 2018 and given retrospective effect from 6 June 2018. This amendment introduced a new clause (c) under sub-section (4) of Section 34, thereby expanding the grounds on which the Adjudicating Authority may reject the appointment of a proposed liquidator.
Bare Text of Section 34(4) – IBC-
“(4) The Adjudicating Authority shall by order replace the resolution professional, if—
(a) the resolution plan submitted by the resolution professional under section 30 was rejected for failure to meet the requirements mentioned in sub-section (2) of section 30; or
(b) the Board recommends the replacement of a resolution professional to the Adjudicating Authority for reasons to be recorded in writing; or
(c) the resolution professional fails to submit written consent under sub-section (1)”
Section 34(4) empowers the Adjudicating Authority to replace the resolution professional (RP) with another insolvency professional before appointing a liquidator for the corporate debtor’s liquidation process. The primary purpose of Section 34(4) is to ensure that the liquidator appointed to carry out the liquidation process is impartial, competent, and conflict-free. It empowers the Adjudicating Authority to reject the appointment of the Resolution Professional as the liquidator if certain disqualifying conditions are present.
The Adjudicating Authority shall replace the resolution professional and appoint another insolvency professional as the liquidator, if any of the following conditions are met:
1. Ensure Compliance with the Code- Clause (a) allows replacement if the RP submitted a non-compliant resolution plan, which was rejected under Section 30(2). This ensures that a professional who failed to comply with statutory requirements during CIRP is not entrusted with the more critical liquidation stage.
2. Enable oversight by the IBBI – Clause (b) gives the IBBI the authority to recommend replacement if it has valid concerns regarding the RP’s conduct, performance, or eligibility — provided the reasons are documented. This introduces a regulatory check in the interest of professionalism and accountability.
3. Mandatory Written Consent requirement- Clause (c) ensures that an RP cannot be appointed as liquidator without giving written consent as required under Section 34(1). If the RP fails to provide such consent, the NCLT must appoint someone else.
Section 34(5) – Direction to IBBI for Nomination of New Liquidator.
This provision gives the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) the power to seek assistance from the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) in selecting a new liquidator when:
- Clause (a): The resolution professional submitted a non-compliant resolution plan, and
- Clause (c): The resolution professional fails to give written consent to act as liquidator.
Bare Text of Section 34(5) – IBC-
“(5) For the purposes of clause (a) and (c) of sub-section (4), the Adjudicating Authority may direct the Board to propose the name of another insolvency professional to be appointed as a liquidator.”
Section 34(6) – Time-Bound Nomination of Liquidator by the IBBI
Section 34(6) was amended by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Second Amendment) Act, 2018 (Act No. 26 of 2018), which was enacted on 17 August 2018 and given retrospective effect from 6 June 2018. This amendment specifically inserted the words “along with written consent from the insolvency professional in the specified form” into Section 34(6).
The purpose of this insertion was to ensure that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) not only proposes the name of an insolvency professional but also obtains prior written consent from the proposed professional in the prescribed format, thereby streamlining and formalizing the appointment process.
Bare Text of Section 34(6) – IBC-
“(6) The Board shall propose the name of another insolvency professional along with written consent from the insolvency professional in the specified form within ten days of the direction issued by the Adjudicating Authority under sub-section (5).”
This provision ensures a time-bound and efficient mechanism for the replacement of a resolution professional with a new liquidator. Once the Adjudicating Authority issues a direction under Section 34(5), the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) is legally required to:
- Identify and recommend a suitable insolvency professional for appointment as the liquidator,
- Obtain and submit the written consent of the proposed professional in the prescribed form, and
- Complete the process within ten days of receiving the direction, thereby avoiding any delay in the commencement or continuation of the liquidation proceedings.
Section 34(7) – Appointment of Liquidator by the Adjudicating Authority based on IBBI proposal.
Upon receiving the proposal from the IBBI for the appointment of an insolvency professional as the liquidator, the Adjudicating Authority shall, by an order, appoint such insolvency professional as the liquidator.
Bare Text of Section 34(7) – IBC-
“(7) The Adjudicating Authority shall, on receipt of the proposal of the Board for the appointment of an insolvency professional as liquidator, by an order appoint such insolvency professional as the liquidator.”
Section 34(8) – Fee structure for Liquidator as prescribed by the IBBI.
An insolvency professional proposed to be appointed as the liquidator shall charge a fee for conducting the liquidation proceedings in such manner and proportion to the value of the liquidation estate assets as may be specified by the IBBI.
Bare Text of Section 34(8) – IBC-
“(8) An insolvency professional proposed to be appointed as a liquidator shall charge such fee for the conduct of the liquidation proceedings and in such proportion to the value of the liquidation estate assets, as may be specified by the Board.”
This provision ensures a regulated, fair, and transparent fee structure for liquidators. It is intended to prevent excessive or arbitrary fee claims by insolvency professionals and to align the liquidator’s remuneration with the value, scale, and complexity of the liquidation estate. By linking the fee to the estate’s value, it promotes accountability, proportionality, and consistency in the conduct of liquidation proceedings.
Section 34(9) – Payment of Liquidator’s fees from Liquidation Estate proceeds.
The fees payable to the liquidator for conducting the liquidation proceedings, as referred to in sub-section (8), shall be paid from the proceeds of the liquidation estate in accordance with the distribution waterfall laid down under Section 53 of the Code.
Bare Text of Section 34(9) – IBC-
“(9) The fees for the conduct of the liquidation proceedings under sub-section (8) shall be paid to the liquidator from the proceeds of the liquidation estate under section 53.”
Conclusion: Section 34 of the IBC deals with the appointment and role of the liquidator once a liquidation order is passed. Typically, the existing resolution professional is appointed as the liquidator unless replaced for valid reasons. This section also provides for the cessation of powers of the Board of Directors and the management, transferring complete control of the corporate debtor to the liquidator. Additionally, it specifies that the fee payable to the liquidator shall be determined as per regulations notified by the IBBI. Section 34 thus ensures a clear framework for professional and regulated liquidation management.
*****
Disclaimer: Nothing contained in this document is to be construed as a legal opinion or view of either of the author whatsoever and the content is to be used strictly for informational and educational purposes. While due care has been taken in preparing this article, certain mistakes and omissions may creep in. the author does not accept any liability for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any inaccurate or incomplete information in this document nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
Author Bio
