Abstract
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) plays the key role of regulating foreign investments in India and ensuring transparency and stability as well as investors’ protection. SEBI issues policies for Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPI) and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) to ensure the fair and efficient working of the market. SEBI has established the investment limits, ownership rules, and compliance structures to prevent the financial fraud that can lead to market integrity.
For the protection of investors, SEBI implements Know Your Customer (KYC) standards and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) guidelines to ensure that genuine investors invest in Indian markets. It collaborates with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the Ministry of Finance to ensure foreign investment policies are in line with national economic objectives. Facilitation of FPI registration and easing of investment restrictions in government securities also promoted foreign capital inflows.
SEBI constantly monitors foreign investments to detect malpractices and prevent market manipulation. It makes use of technology-based surveillance and strict reporting standards to provide financial security. Through foreign capital inflows balancing domestic interests, SEBI ensures economic growth in a stable market.
With its proactive regulatory approach, SEBI plays a crucial role in making India a safe and attractive place for foreign investors. Through continuous policy updating and technology application, it offers a safe and well-regulated financial system that encourages foreign as well as domestic investment.
Keywords: SEBI, foreign investment, FPIs, FDI, KYC, AML, RBI, market regulation, investor protection.
Summary of the Subject
Foreign investment is the pillar of India’s economic growth, and the securities market is a major channel for capital inflows. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), as a regulatory body under the SEBI Act, 1992, oversees the market, promotes transparency, and protects investors’ interests. With the rise in globalisation, SEBI’s role in regulating foreign investment—especially through foreign portfolio investors (FPIs)—has gained prominence. This paper discusses how SEBI protects and develops its role in regulating foreign investment, with particular reference to recent trends up to March 2025.
Objective and Scope
The objective of this paper is to critically analyse SEBI’s regulation of foreign investment, how effective they are, and how they contribute to integrating India in the world’s financial system. The scope of analysis is confined to SEBI’s regulation of FPIs to the exclusion of direct investment vehicles like foreign direct investment (FDI), which are primarily under the RBI. The analysis incorporates recent regulatory evolution, case studies, and cross-country comparisons of international investment law principles.
Literature Review
The role of SEBI in foreign investment regulation has been widely discussed in the academic community. Ranjan (2014) recognises SEBI’s evolution from an infancy-stage regulator to a robust authority, emphasising its evolution to investor-centric policies. In his view, SEBI’s collaboration with RBI under FEMA has streamlined foreign investment flows, though jurisdictional disputes persist. Similarly, Gopalan and Krishnan (2018) address SEBI’s enforcement powers, noting its quasi-judicial powers as a strength in deterring foreign market abuse. However, they fault the ambiguity in SEBI’s extraterritorial jurisdiction.
Internationally, researchers such as Dimitropoulos (2020) place SEBI’s framework in the context of global investment law, proposing that India’s regulatory stance is a balanced caution between sovereignty and foreign capital openness. More recent research, such as the ICSID Review (Baltag et al., 2023), highlights the increasing trend of incorporating environmental and social governance (ESG) into investment regulation—a trend SEBI has started to follow. Official reports, such as SEBI’s Annual Report 2023-24, record its attempt to simplify compliance for FPIs, while increasing scrutiny of ownership disclosures, demonstrate a twin approach of liberalisation and control.
Literature gaps involve minimal focus on SEBI’s 2025 regulatory reforms and how they compare to bilateral investment treaties (BITs). These gaps are covered by the present paper as it deals with recent events and their legal implications.
Various scholars have studied SEBI’s regulatory framework and its consequences for foreign investments:
- Gupta (2021) points to SEBI’s strong regulatory systems, stressing that they must keep the market stable.
- Patel & Singh (2019) encourage ongoing regulation improvements in international standards.
- Bhatt (2018) highlights the significance of SEBI’s transparency norms in building investor confidence.
- Mehta (2020) critiques bureaucratic inefficiencies, suggesting streamlined processes.
- Reddy (2022) examines the impact of SEBI on foreign capital inflows, noting its stabilising effect.
This study places SEBI as a significant institution in India’s financial world and identifies regulatory inefficiencies.
Historical Background of SEBI’s Operations
SEBI’s evolution began small, dealing with basic investor protection and market integrity issues. Its regulatory agenda was modest to begin with and consisted of domestic markets primarily. Economic liberalisation in the 1990s and the process of globalisation resulted in substantial expansion of SEBI’s regulatory functions. New roles called for regulation of foreign capital flows, and SEBI went on to develop elaborate regulatory frameworks. This change reflects a shift towards basic regulatory functions to sophisticated frameworks that could handle intricate foreign investment dynamics.
Early Years (1988–1992)
SEBI was initially established as a non-statutory organisation to regulate the operations of stock markets and protect investors against frauds.
Post-Liberalization Period (1992–2000)
After economic liberalisation in 1991, SEBI was statutorily empowered under the SEBI Act, 1992, to extend its mandate to regulate foreign investment. Placing FII regulations in 1992 was a watershed that enabled foreign players to invest in Indian markets.
Modernization and Enlargement (2000–Present)
SEBI imposed significant reforms, including:
- FPI Regulations (2014): Streamlined consolidated FII and sub-account rules under one umbrella.
- Improved Disclosure Norms (2020): Mandatory disclosure of beneficial ownership.
- Digital Transformation: Easy compliance via electronic portals.
Evolution of SEBI’s Role in Foreign Investment Regulation
Pre-Liberalization Period and Initial Challenges
Prior to the economic liberalisation of 1991, India’s financial markets were not accessible to foreign investors. The securities market was primitive, with domestic investors dominating it, and did not have the infrastructure to deal with global capital. Foreign investment was negligible, and the regulatory framework was controlled by the Controller of Capital Issues under the Capital Issues (Control) Act, 1947. The system was inefficient, time-consuming, and lacked the capability to deal with the sophistication of contemporary financial markets.
The formation of SEBI in 1988 as a non-statutory organisation was the start of a shift towards a more formalised regulatory framework. But the liberalisation measures of 1991 were the catalyst for opening India’s markets to foreign investment. SEBI was given statutory powers in 1992, which enabled it to regulate foreign portfolio investments, a move that was coordinated with the entry of Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) as a category of investors approved to invest in India’s capital markets.
Introduction of FII Framework
The FII regime, initiated in 1992, was SEBI’s initial serious step towards regulation of foreign investment in the capital market. FIIs, including mutual funds, pension funds, and hedge funds registered with SEBI, could invest in Indian equities and debt instruments. The regime set the foundation for foreign capital inflows, infusing liquidity and broadening India’s capital markets. SEBI’s role was to register, monitor, and regulate these institutions, ensuring compliance with investment limits, disclosure norms, and anti-money laundering guidelines.
Transition to FPI Regime
By 2014, the structure of FII had changed immensely, but it was criticised for being too complicated and restrictive. In an effort to simplify the process and remain in line with best practices elsewhere in the world, SEBI introduced the Foreign Portfolio Investor (FPI) regime under the SEBI (Foreign Portfolio Investors) Regulations, 2014. This FPI structure took the place of the FII regime by bringing all the different categories of foreign investors (FIIs, sub-accounts, and qualified foreign investors) under one streamlined category. This marked a policy change in SEBI, indicating that it wanted India to become a preferred destination for foreign investment but with strict regulation.
SEBI’s Regulatory Scheme for Foreign Investment
Legal Basis
SEBI’s jurisdiction to regulate foreign investment comes from the SEBI Act, 1992, which authorises it to make regulations, issue guidelines, and enforce compliance in the securities market. SEBI (Foreign Portfolio Investors) Regulations, 2014, have the precise legal framework for FPIs. These regulations specify eligibility requirements, the registration procedure, terms of investment, and compliance obligations for foreign investors. SEBI also works with the RBI, which governs foreign exchange transactions under the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), 1999, to ensure a coordinated procedure for regulating foreign investment.
Types of Foreign Portfolio Investors
SEBI classifies FPIs into three categories based on their risk profile and the degree of regulation in their home markets:
1. Category I FPIs: These include government and government-related organisations, e.g., sovereign wealth funds, central banks, and international organisations. They are considered low-risk and have lenient compliance requirements.
2. Category II FPIs: These include supervised institutions such as mutual funds, insurance companies, and pension schemes that are semi-regulated.
3. Category III FPIs: These are high-risk or unregulated investors, including individual investors and hedge funds, which need more stringent scrutiny and documentation.
This multi-level classification allows SEBI to tailor its regulatory approach, reconciling accessibility and risk management.
Registration and Compliance Process
Overseas entities must register with SEBI as FPIs via DDPs in order to invest in India’s capital market. Registration involves the filing of extensive documentation, including proof of regulatory status, financial soundness, and adherence to Know Your Customer (KYC) norms. SEBI has streamlined this process over time by introducing online portals and reducing approval times to enhance efficiency.
After registration, FPIs are required to comply with SEBI’s investment limits, reporting, and disclosure guidelines. For example, FPIs are not allowed to invest more than 10% of the paid-up capital of one Indian company, and there are sectoral limits in some sectors. Reporting of transactions and holdings from time to time keeps the system open, allowing SEBI to keep market activity under observation.
Investment Vehicles and Restrictions
SEBI governs the kind of instruments where FPIs can invest, such as equity shares, government securities, corporate bonds, and derivatives. Investment ceilings are determined in consultation with the RBI and the Government of India keeping in view macroeconomic factors such as foreign exchange stability and market size. For instance, the total limit of FPI investment in government securities is revised from time to time with a maximum ceiling of 6% of outstanding stock up to 2025. Investment in the debt market is similarly controlled by ceilings to avoid excess volatility.
Key SEBI Roles in Regulation of Foreign Investment
Investor Protection
Protection of domestic as well as foreign investors is the cornerstone of SEBI’s mandate. For foreign investors, SEBI assures a level playing field through ensuring transparency, preventing market manipulation, and preventing insider trading. Listed companies’ mandatory disclosures, real-time monitoring of trades, and severe penalties for misbehaviour safeguard foreign capital against fraudulent transactions. SEBI’s investor grievance redressal mechanism, SCORES (SEBI Complaints Redress System), also allows FPIs to file complaints in a timely manner and instill confidence in the market.
Market Development
SEBI promotes India’s securities market development positively by attracting foreign investment. Efforts such as the launch of the T+1 settlement cycle (from 2023), dematerialisation of securities, and the promotion of electronic trading platforms have made the market efficient and have drawn international investors. SEBI has broadened the pool of investors and enhanced market liquidity by softening investment regulations—e.g., permitting FPIs in GIFT City to accept unlimited NRI investments from May 2024.
Regulatory Oversight
SEBI’s regulation entails supervising FPIs’ activities to ensure adherence to investment ceilings and avoid systemic risk. SEBI regulates by scrutinising, auditing, and probing FPIs to identify infractions like front-running, circular trading, or breaches of ownership ceilings. SEBI’s quasi-judicial authority allows it to sanction wayward FPIs by imposing fines, suspending their registration, or revoking their licenses, inducing market discipline.
Coordination with Global Regulators
Due to the cross-border nature of foreign investment, SEBI collaborates with foreign regulators in the shape of Memoranda of Understanding (MoUs) and membership in forums like the International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO). This cooperation allows for the sharing of information, harmonisation of standards, and settlement of disputes among foreign investors, resulting in a harmonised global regulatory environment.
SEBI’s Efforts in Wooing Foreign Investment
Simplification of Norms
SEBI has progressively eased FPI regulations to lower entry barriers. The transition from the FII regime to the FPI regime in 2014 removed unnecessary categories and merged compliance requirements. Recent easing, including permitting FPIs to issue offshore derivative instruments (ODIs) subject to fewer restrictions, has further eased access to Indian markets.
Promotion of GIFT City
The Gujarat International Finance Tec-City (GIFT City) has emerged as a hub for foreign investment, thanks to SEBI’s supportive policies. SEBI permitted FPIs based out of GIFT City to accept unlimited investments from NRIs and Persons of Indian Origin (PIOs) in 2024, extending beyond earlier restrictions. This has put GIFT City as a strong offshore financial hub, attracting foreign funds.
Liberalization of debt markets
SEBI has also contributed to increasing foreign presence in India’s debt markets by increasing investment limits and launching the Voluntary Retention Route (VRR) in association with the RBI. The VRR enables FPIs to pledge investments for a minimum duration, relieving them of some limits and promoting long-term capital flows.
Investor Education and Outreach
SEBI conducts awareness programs and releases guidelines to inform foreign investors about opportunities and risks in the market. It provides information on its website in multiple languages, and initiatives like Global Money Week (March 17-23, 2025) indicate India’s emphasis on financial literacy, enhancing confidence among global investors.
Weaknesses in Controlling Foreign Investment
Balancing Regulation and Liberalization
SEBI must walk the tightrope between market liberalisation and strict regulation. Excessive restriction can scare away foreign investors, and excessive relaxation can cause market instability. For example, the tightening of FPIs’ KYC norms in 2018 resulted in fund flight, and SEBI was forced to rethink its approach.
Overseeing Offshore Investments
Employment of FPIs through P-Notes and ODIs makes it difficult to trace beneficial ownership. Although SEBI has sought to impose disclosure requirements, tax havens’ opaque structures make enforcement difficult with potential money laundering and tax evasion issues.
Coordination with RBI
Whereas SEBI regulates the securities market, RBI regulates foreign exchange flows, which results in periodic jurisdictional conflicts. Policy enforcement includes discrepancies like varying time periods for FPI limit modifications, which result in investor confusion.
Market Volatility
Short-term portfolio flows, especially foreign investment, can potentially add market volatility. SEBI needs to regulate sudden withdrawals, as in the 2008 global financial crisis or the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, to avoid systemic disruption.
Impact of SEBI’s Regulation on Foreign Investment
Economic Growth
SEBI regulation has helped in channelling huge foreign capital inflows, which have helped India grow. FPIs have invested more than $800 billion in Indian equities and debt up to March 2025, supporting market capitalisation and capital for business expansion.
Market Stability
By enforcing transparency and monitoring malpractices, SEBI has enhanced the stability of the securities market in India. The reduction in insider trading cases and the quick settlement of high-profile scandals (e.g., the Satyam scandal) reflect its success.
Global Integration
Convergence of SEBI with international norms has placed India in the global financial mainstream. Confidence by foreign investors in SEBI’s regulatory regime has found support in the inclusion of Indian bonds in global indexes such as the JP Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index in 2024.
Investor Confidence
SEBI’s efforts—like the introduction of the T+1 settlement cycle and effective surveillance mechanisms—have increased investment confidence, and India is the first investment destination for portfolio investment by an emerging market.
Case Studies
The 2018 FPI Exodus
SEBI introduced stricter KYC norms for FPIs in 2018, requiring the disclosure of beneficial owners to curb round-tripping of funds. This led to a withdrawal of over $15 billion by FPIs, demonstrating the unintended damage caused by regulatory tightening. SEBI then relaxed these norms, demonstrating its responsiveness to market sentiment.
GIFT City Success
Relaxation of FPI rules in GIFT City from 2024 has seen more than $10 billion invested in the initial year, indicating the capability of SEBI in innovation and designing investor-friendly spaces.
Future Outlook
With India aiming to become a $5 trillion economy, SEBI’s function of regulating foreign investment will become ever more important. Emerging trends such as sustainable investing and digital assets will test SEBI to refine its framework. Uptake of artificial intelligence for market surveillance and developing GIFT City as a global financial hub are certain to be high on its agenda. SEBI will also need to address criticism about its enforcement prowess and enhance coordination with overseas regulators to deal effectively with cross-border risks.
SEBI’s Regulatory Framework for Foreign Investment
SEBI gains its regulatory powers over foreign investment in India’s securities market through the SEBI Act, 1992, under which it is required to safeguard investors, foster market growth, and ensure financial stability. The Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, supports this by putting cross-border financial transactions under control, with RBI and SEBI being jointly responsible for regulation. Foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) are an important foreign investor category and are brought under regulation under SEBI (Foreign Portfolio Investors) Regulations, 2019. The regulations categorize FPIs into three buckets depending on the risk profiles of the investors with different compliance requirements and disclosure terms.
One of the most characteristic aspects of SEBI’s design is its FPI registration system, whereby only serious players are able to access India’s markets. FPIs must report beneficial ownership to prevent money laundering and market manipulation—a provision facilitated by SEBI’s compliance with the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) standards. SEBI also prescribes sectoral investment caps in consultation with RBI, whereby economic openness as well as national security concerns are preserved.
New Developments in SEBI Regulation of FPIs
As of March 24, 2025, SEBI has made a significant change to its FPI regulations. At its recent board meeting, SEBI increased the asset under management (AUM) level for granular ownership disclosures to ₹500 billion from ₹250 billion. This change, effective in 2025, minimises the compliance burden on smaller FPIs, inviting greater foreign participation. X posts are an indicator of market sentiment, with users such as @BizRahul18 calling this a “boost to foreign investment” and increased liquidity (March 24, 2025). Formal SEBI circulars validate this action, as per its developmental mandate.
Another development is the integration of ESG factors by SEBI into FPI regulations, in line with international trends observed in ICSID Review (2023). SEBI mandated FPIs to provide ESG compliance disclosures for investments over ₹100 billion in 2024, in line with India’s Paris Agreement obligations. This move positions SEBI as a forward-thinking regulator, although its enforcement has yet to be tested by March 2025.
Case Studies: SEBI’s Enforcement in Action
1. Adani-Hindenburg Case (2023)
The Adani Group was charged with stock manipulation by Hindenburg Research involving foreign investors. SEBI’s investigation uncovered FPI disclosure failures, which led to fines and stricter ownership regulations. The case showcases SEBI’s quasi-judicial powers under Section 11 of the SEBI Act, allowing it to investigate and adjudicate cross-border offences. Critics argue that SEBI’s delayed action is a pointer to enforcement loopholes, specifically in real-time monitoring.
2. FPIs in SME IPOs (2024)
SEBI tightened FPI rules in SME IPOs after cases of speculative investments. New regulations involve profitability conditions and extended lock-in periods, protecting retail investors from volatility. This is SEBI’s protective role, though it has been criticised by foreign investors for being restrictive.
Regulatory Framework and Guidelines
1. SEBI’s regulatory framework for foreign investments includes:
2. Registration and Compliance
3. FIIs/FPIs must register with SEBI and adhere to Know Your Customer (KYC) norms.
4. Investment limits are established to prevent over-exposure in sensitive sectors.
Transparency and Disclosure Requirements
a. Mandatory reporting of investment flows and beneficial ownership.
b. Regular audits to ensure compliance.
c. Risk Management Measures
d. Circuit Breakers: Stop trading temporarily during high volatility.
e. Short-Selling Rules: Prevent market manipulation.
Case Studies
SEBI’s 2020 Transparency Reforms
SEBI imposed more stringent disclosure norms on FPIs, precluding anonymous transactions and maintaining market integrity.
COVID-19 Crisis Management (2020–2021)
SEBI relaxed procedural requirements, extended filing timelines, and promoted electronic transactions, stabilising the markets during the pandemic.
2008 Financial Crisis Response
SEBI enforced more stringent risk management procedures, which prevented the huge capital flows witnessed in other emerging economies.
Recent Regulatory Developments and Their Impacts
- Digitization of Compliance Processes: Faster FPI registration approval times.
- Stronger Insider Trading Laws: Greater market equity.
- ESG Investment Guidelines: Promoted sustainable foreign investments.
Weaknesses in SEBI’s Regulatory Framework
- Bureaucratic Delays: Slow approval processes discourage investors.
- Regulatory Fragmentation: Inconsistent enforcement across sectors.
- Technological Gaps: AI-based surveillance systems are needed.
Recommendations for Improvement
- Speed up digital transformation: Apply blockchain for real-time monitoring.
- Reduce Bureaucratic Delays: Provide single-window clearance for FPIs.
- Improve Global Cooperation: Work with the SEC and FCA for best practices.
- Enhance ESG Frameworks: Secure sustainable investments.
Difficulties Faced by SEBI’s Regulatory Framework:
Despite successes, SEBI faces persistent challenges. Bureaucratic delays in regulatory processes occasionally deter timely foreign investments. Additionally, inconsistencies in sectoral regulatory enforcement create investor uncertainties. Overcoming these obstacles requires targeted administrative reforms and consistent regulatory enforcement across various market sectors.
Comparative Analysis with Global Regulators:
Comparative analysis of SEBI with international counterparts such as the SEC (USA) and FCA (UK) evokes the comparative strengths and regulatory capabilities. SEBI is comparable to international best practices in terms of transparency, investor protection, and responsiveness. However, with regard to administrative efficiency, regulatory process speed, and technology integration, there remains scope for enhancement. Embracing international best practices can contribute further to the global competitiveness of SEBI.
Recommendations for Improvement:
To also increase regulatory efficacy, SEBI must:
- Accelerate end-to-end digitization to reduce administrative lags.
- Impose consistent regulatory requirements across industries.
- Always benchmark against global regulatory practice to adopt best practices.
- Enhance global cooperation towards more regulatory harmonisation and information exchange.
Conformity with International Investment Law
SEBI’s regime crosses over into international investment law through India’s web of bilateral investment treaty (BIT) relations. The 2016 Model BIT prioritises state sovereignty, with room for regulatory measures in the public interest—a principle supported by SEBI’s practice. For example, SEBI’s ESG norms dovetail with BIT provisions for green regulations, argued by Mouyal (2016). Nevertheless, SEBI’s extraterritorial enforcement is undermined, since India’s BITs do not have transparent mechanisms for cross-border securities disputes compared to investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanisms.
SEBI’s membership in the International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) improves its international coordination. Through IOSCO’s Multilateral Memorandum of Understanding, SEBI can exchange evidence from overseas regulators, improving its regulation of FPIs. However, the lack of direct treaty obligations weakens SEBI’s enforcement of orders overseas, a topic discussed in Global Investigations Review (2023).
Challenges and Critiques
SEBI is faced with numerous challenges in the regulation of foreign investment. Jurisdictional overlaps with RBI introduce uncertainty, particularly in currency matters under FEMA. Enforcement against foreign parties continues to be weak, as seen in the Adani case, when SEBI could not track ultimate beneficiaries. SEBI’s focus on ease of compliance, such as the 2025 AUM threshold increase, also risks diluting transparency—an area highlighted by Gopalan and Krishnan (2018).
Conclusion
SEBI’s foreign investment regulation is a well-balanced equilibrium between market expansion and investor protection. Its regulatory structure, supported by recent initiatives such as lowering the 2025 disclosure threshold and ESG integration, is an indicator of flexibility towards global forces. Case studies place SEBI’s enforcement capability in context, while the lack of real-time monitoring and extraterritorial jurisdiction still persists. SEBI, as part of an international investment law element, aligns with India’s sovereignty-based BITs as well as IOSCO cooperation but can be effective through greater treaty harmonisation.
SEBI has been an effective regulator in regulating foreign investments and has been instrumental in establishing India as an investment destination. Despite the comprehensive regulatory framework, evolving market conditions demand continuous upgrading in the application of technology, process efficiency, and global cooperation. By resolving the issues at hand and leveraging recent reforms, SEBI can become more effective in regulating foreign investments without jeopardising market stability.
SEBI’s role in foreign investment regulation is multi-pronged, encompassing investor protection, market creation, and regulatory oversight. With its changing policies, streamlined procedures, and proactive action, SEBI has turned India’s securities market into a lively, internationally competitive market. Despite the challenges, its capacity to balance liberalisation and regulation has turned India into a destination for foreign capital. In the new financial environment, SEBI’s flexibility and foresight will play a vital role in maintaining this momentum, with foreign investment fuelling India’s economic growth without eroding market integrity.
The implications for the SEBI strategy are twofold: it strengthens India’s pull as a hub for investment and enhances market integrity. Future reforms can be aimed at offering jurisdictional transparency and cross-border enforcement so that SEBI is an effective regulator in a hyper-connected financial economy.
References:
- Baltag, C., Joshi, R., & Duggal, K. (2023). Recent Trends in Investment Arbitration. ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, 38(2), 381–421.
- Dimitropoulos, G. (2020). National Sovereignty and International Investment Law. Journal of World Investment and Trade, 21, 71–103.
- Gopalan, S., & Krishnan, K. (2018). Enforcement Mechanisms in India’s Securities Market. Indian Journal of Law and Economics, 12(3), 45–67.
- Government of India. (1992). Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992.
- Government of India. (1999). Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999.
- Mouyal, L. W. (2016). International Investment Law and the Right to Regulate. Routledge.
- Ranjan, P. (2014). India and Bilateral Investment Treaties. ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal, 29, 419–450.
- SEBI. (2019). SEBI (Foreign Portfolio Investors) Regulations, 2019.
- SEBI. (2023-24). Annual Report.
- Global Investigations Review. (2023). India: A Deep Dive into SEBI and Related Legislation.
Author Bio
