Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Varaha Builders Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Varaha Builders Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court) Karnataka High Court remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer since non-response to notice issued under section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act by the petitioner was due to bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause. Facts- The present petition is preferred by the petitioner mainly requesting quashing of the notice issued under section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act. Notably, petitioner has not responded to the notice so issued and contested that notices so issued was not received by the petitioner. Thus, the inability a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031