Dividend Received from Foreign Subsidiaries – Taxation and Section 80M Interplay
The abolition of the Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) regime and the shift to the classical system of taxation marked a significant structural reform in the Indian tax landscape. For Indian parent companies receiving dividends from their domestic subsidiaries, this shift was mitigated by the introduction of Section 80M, which aims to prevent double taxation. However, a critical asymmetry arises when the dividend flows from a foreign subsidiary. The interplay between the taxation of such foreign dividends and the provisions of Section 80M creates a complex scenario that can lead to a substantial tax burden, undermining the competitiveness of Indian multinationals. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the taxation of dividends received from foreign subsidiaries for the Assessment Year 2025-26, highlighting the pivotal role of the Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) mechanism and the unresolved dilemma posed by Section 80M.
The New Tax Architecture for Dividends
Under the classical system, applicable from A.Y. 2021-22 onwards:
- Taxability: Dividends declared, distributed, or paid by any company are taxable in the hands of the shareholder under the head “Income from Other Sources.”
- Deduction for Expenses: A deduction is allowed under Section 57 for any interest expense incurred solely for the purpose of earning such dividend income. The cap is 20% of the dividend income.
This means an Indian parent company must pay tax on dividends received from its foreign subsidiary at its applicable corporate tax rate (e.g., 22% + surcharge + cess under Section 115BAA, or 25% + surcharge + cess).
The Section 80M Conundrum: A Domestic Solution to a Foreign Problem
Section 80M was introduced to prevent the double taxation of dividends within a domestic corporate chain.
- The Provision: It states that where a domestic company receives any dividend from another domestic company, and it itself declares, distributes, or pays any dividend to its shareholders on or before the due date of filing its return, a deduction of such amount of dividend paid shall be allowed from the dividend income it received.
- The Logic: It ensures that the same profit is not taxed multiple times as it moves up the corporate ladder. The tax is effectively paid only at the level of the ultimate individual shareholder.
The Critical Exclusion and its Impact: Section 80M is explicitly applicable only to dividends received from a domestic company. It does not apply to dividends received from a foreign company.
This creates a significant disadvantage for Indian companies with foreign investments:
- Domestic Subsidiary: An Indian parent receives ₹100 crore dividend from its Indian sub. It distributes ₹80 crore to its own shareholders. Under Section 80M, its taxable dividend income is only ₹20 crore (₹100 cr – ₹80 cr).
- Foreign Subsidiary: An Indian parent receives ₹100 crore dividend from its foreign sub. Even if it distributes the entire ₹100 crore to its shareholders, it gets no deduction under Section 80M. The entire ₹100 crore is taxable in its hands.
This leads to what is known as “economic double taxation”—the same profit is taxed in the hands of the foreign subsidiary (in the source country) and again in the hands of the Indian parent company.
The Primary Relief: Foreign Tax Credit (FTC)
The main mechanism to alleviate this double taxation is the Foreign Tax Credit under Sections 90 and 91.
- Section 90 (DTAA): If the foreign subsidiary is located in a country with which India has a DTAA, the Indian parent can claim a credit for the underlying tax (the tax paid by the subsidiary on its profits) and the withholding tax (the tax deducted on the dividend payment) against its Indian tax liability on the dividend income.
- Section 91 (Non-Treaty Countries): For countries with no DTAA, a credit is available for the tax paid in that country, subject to Indian tax rates.
The Compliance Maze and Limitations of FTC
While FTC is the primary relief, its application is fraught with complexity for A.Y. 2025-26:
1. Computation of Underlying Tax: Calculating the underlying tax credit is complex. It requires determining the portion of the foreign subsidiary’s tax that is attributable to the profits out of which the dividend was paid. The formula is: (Dividend Paid / Post-Tax Profit of Foreign Sub) * Total Tax Paid by Foreign Sub.
2. Per-Country Limitation: FTC must be computed separately for each source country. Excess credit from one country cannot be used to offset tax liability on income from another country.
3. Year of Claim: The credit is available in the year in which the dividend income is offered to tax in India. Mismatches can occur if the foreign tax is paid in a different year.
4. Documentation: The burden of proof is on the taxpayer to provide a certificate from a chartered accountant or the foreign tax authority, substantiating the taxes paid abroad.
A.Y. 2025-26 Case Study: An Indian Tech Parent with a US Subsidiary
- Facts: An Indian company, taxed at 25%, receives a dividend of $1 million from its 100% US subsidiary. The US subsidiary paid corporate tax of $300,000 on its profits, and a 10% withholding tax ($100,000) on the dividend.
- Indian Tax Computation:
- Dividend Income (Grossed-up): ₹8.3 crore (approx.)
- Indian Tax @25%: ₹2.075 crore
- FTC Claim:
- Underlying Tax Credit: $300,000 (₹2.49 crore approx.) But limited to Indian tax on that income.
- Withholding Tax Credit: $100,000 (₹83 lakh approx.)
- Total FTC: ₹ (2.075 crore, being the lower of underlying tax and Indian tax) + ₹0.83 crore = ₹2.905 crore. However, the total Indian tax payable is only ₹2.075 crore, so the FTC is capped at this amount.
- Net Result: The Indian tax liability is fully offset by the FTC. However, the company has borne the compliance cost of the calculation and has unutilized foreign tax credits that are lost.
Conclusion: A Call for Parity
The current tax framework places Indian multinationals at a comparative disadvantage. While the FTC mechanism prevents absolute double taxation, it is complex, limited, and does not provide the seamless flow-through that Section 80M affords to domestic dividends. The inability to claim a deduction under Section 80M for dividends distributed out of foreign profits results in a higher book tax expense and a cash-flow disadvantage. For the Assessment Year 2025-26 and beyond, Indian companies with global ambitions must navigate this complex FTC compliance maze meticulously. A prudent long-term policy solution would be to extend the benefit of Section 80M to dividends received from foreign subsidiaries, or to move towards a full participation exemption system, thereby creating a level playing field for Indian multinationals in the global arena.
Author Bio
