Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hafizullah Farukh Chaudharr Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Hafizullah Farukh Chaudharr Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) In a significant relief to the assessee, the Mumbai ITAT set aside orders of the CIT(A) dismissing appeals solely on the ground of 179-day delay and restored the matters for fresh adjudication, observing that the assessee deserves one more opportunity in the interest of justice and fair play. The assessee’s appeals for AYs 2020-21 and 2022-23 were dismissed by the CIT(A) after rejecting the application for condonation of delay without adjudicating the issues on merits. The additions challenged included alleged unexplained cash payments u/s 69C...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Benami Veil Cannot Be Lifted by Clever Drafting: SC Restores Rejection of Plaint at Threshold Specific Performance Decree Does Not Die Automatically: SC Revives Execution Despite Delay in Deposit IBC Is Not a Recovery Shortcut: SC Rejects CIRP in Builder-Bank-Borrower Dispute No Signature, Yet Bound by Arbitration: SC Allows Collaborator to Invoke Arbitration Clause Entire Bank Deposits Cannot Be Taxed as Income – ITAT Restricts Addition to 2% in Renukamata Society Cases View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031