Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hafizullah Farukh Chaudharr Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Hafizullah Farukh Chaudharr Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) In a significant relief to the assessee, the Mumbai ITAT set aside orders of the CIT(A) dismissing appeals solely on the ground of 179-day delay and restored the matters for fresh adjudication, observing that the assessee deserves one more opportunity in the interest of justice and fair play. The assessee’s appeals for AYs 2020-21 and 2022-23 were dismissed by the CIT(A) after rejecting the application for condonation of delay without adjudicating the issues on merits. The additions challenged included alleged unexplained cash payments u/s 69C...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bangalore ITAT Upholds Section 11 Exemption Despite Alleged Capitation Fee Collections Bangalore ITAT Allows Mine Development Expenditure as Revenue Expense; Deletes Double Addition ITAT Allows Exemption for BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition; Cash Redeposit from Earlier Property Sale Accepted Entire Sales Receipts Cannot Be Taxed Under Section 69A: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930