This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Inadvertent filing of Form 10-IB instead of 10-IC cannot take away benefit u/s. 115BAA
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ACIT Vs Magik Kraft Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2023-24
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ACIT Vs Magik Kraft Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai held that benefit under section 115BAA of the Income Tax Act cannot be denied for inadvertent filing of Form 10-IB in place of Form 10-IC since the same is technical lapse. Accordingly, order of CIT(A) is sustained and appeal of revenue is dismissed.
Facts- The assessee company is engaged in the business of trading and had filed return of income by taking tax rate u/s 115BAA of the Act @ 22%+ surcharge + Education Cess and paid tax of Rs. 1,99,16,614/-. However, the assessee received an intimation order along with ...







