Prosecution launched by the Deputy Director for alleged non disclosure of cash by assessee and his wife was not maintainable and premature one. Merely because the power vested to lodge a complaint by the Deputy Director every case the prosecution could not be launched merely on the conferment of such power without any material. If AO came to the conclusion in a proceedings under Section 153 of the Income Tax Act, it was open to the Department to initiate penal action as per law.
DCIT Vs Ganesh Plantation Ltd. (ITAT Ahmadabad) AO on one hand has recorded his finding with respect to the shares of certain companies that its face value stands at ₹10 but the assessee has purchased the same at a higher value. The basis of arriving at the conclusion that the assessee has purchased the shares […]
As per Information available on GST website GSTR-9 of FY 2019-20 is available now on GST Portal for filing but Computation of the table 8A of GSTR-9 for auto population from returns is under progress which is likely to be completed soon. For details Visit-GSTR-9 of FY 2019-20 is available now but without table 8A […]
As per information on GSTN website GSTR-9 of FY 2019-20 is available now for filing. Facility to file annual return in Form GSTR-9 for FY 2019-20 is now available. The Form is enabled for taxpayers whose table 8A computation has been completed. Computation of the table 8A of the said return for auto population from […]
Since the petition against Enforcement Directorate towards claiming of interest under section 42(3) of FERA towards seized travellers cheques was filed more than 9 years after receiving the rupee equivalent of UK Pounds 1800 without providing of any reasonable explanation for the delay, therefore, the same was liable to be rejected solely on the ground of laches.
Application and affidavits filed in support thereof discloses sufficient cause for non-appearance. The Tribunal, has inappropriately rejected the Miscellaneous Application, without examining the merits of the said submissions. Paras 5 and 6 of the Impugned Order, as reproduced above, reveal that the Tribunal dismissed the Miscellaneous Application merely on the ground that the Petitioner had sought frequent adjournments
Tikeshwar Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh (Chhattisgarh High Court) Vehicle seized for commission of offence under Section 20(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; interim custody can be granted under Section 451/457 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER /JUDGEMENT 1. This petition under Section […]
ICAI vide its Draft Chartered Accountants (Amendment) Regulations, 2020 proposed changes to FORM ‘18’ related to PARTICULARS OF OFFICES AND FIRMS (See Section 2(2) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, Regulation 53B and Regulation 190 of the Chartered Accountants Regulations, 1988). THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA NOTIFICATION New Delhi, the 10th December, 2020 […]
Section 80 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 158 of the CGST Rules, 2017 governs the provisions for Payment of tax and other amounts in installments. Following aspects are dealt in the form of questions and their answers. Q 1. Who is allowed to make payment of tax and other amount in installments? […]
PCIT Vs Yum Restaurants India Pvt. Ltd (Delhi High Court) The Court sets aside the impugned order and the corresponding orders of the AO/TPO and the DRP as regards the issue of AMP expenses and remands the issue concerning the determination of the existence of an international transaction between the Assessee and its AE involving […]
