"06 December 2017" Archive

Expense on replacement of optic fibre cables on regular basis to retain existing Customers is revenue expense

DCIT Vs Ms Alliance Broad Band Services Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Kolkata)

Contention of that assessee was that the traditional cable was cut and damaged by the rival cable network operators. The assessee therein had to necessarily replace the damaged part of the cables alone and not the entire cable by optical fibre cable for transmitting TV signals....

Read More

Reduce DDT and bring down maximum rate of Income Tax to 20%- Budget Suggestions

Other suggestions include reduction in Dividends Distribution Tax and to bring down the maximum rate of Income Tax to 20% to encourage investment, at par with other development countries. It was also suggested to create Regulations Free Export Zone for setting-up 100% Export Oriented Units both by domestic and foreign investors which in t...

Read More
Posted Under: Income Tax |

Abated assessments cannot be disturbed if no incriminating material found during search

Shri Krishna Kumar Singhania Vs. DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)

Legislature had conferred powers on AO to just follow assessments already concluded unless there is an incriminating material found in search to disturb concluded assessment....

Read More

No Section 14A disallowance for dividend earned on Strategic Investment in Subsidiary Company

DCIT Vs M/s Development Constultant Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Kolkata)

This appeal as well as Cross Objection (CO) by the Revenue and assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-9, Kolkata dated 01.12.2015. Assessment was framed by DCIT, Circle-11, Kolkata u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961...

Read More

Expenses incurred to earn Interest Income can be claimed u/s 57(iii)

Income Tax Officer Vs. M/s Borojalingh Tea Co. (ITAT Kolkata)

ITO Vs. M/s Borojalingh Tea Co. (ITAT Kolkata) The question before us arises so as to whether the assessee is entitled for claiming the interest expense against the interest income in the given facts and circumstances. It is undisputed fact that the loan was provided to the parties on interest and accordingly interest income was […...

Read More

Section 194C TDS not applicable on Transport Charges Reimbursed to suppliers

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Sri Gobinda Gupta (ITAT Kolkata)

This appeal is preferred by the Revenue against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Burdwan dated 20.01.2016 and the solitary issue involved therein relates to the deletion by the ld. CIT(Appeals) of the disallowance of Rs.32,06,445/- and Rs.3,58,000/-...

Read More

IBBI (Grievance and Complaint Handling Procedure) Regulations, 2017

Notification No. IBBI/2017-18/GN/REG/21 06/12/2017

(1) These regulations may be called the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Grievance and Complaint Handling Procedure) Regulations, 2017. (2) These regulations shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette....

Read More

TDS U/s. 194H not deductible on bank guarantee commission

DCIT Vs. PRL Projects & Infrastructure Lt. (ITAT Delhi)

When the bank issues a bank guarantee on behalf of the assessee, all it does is to accept the commitment of making payment of a specified amount to the beneficiary on demand and it is in consideration of this commitment that the bank charges of fee which is termed as ‘bank guarantee commission’...

Read More

Payments made towards making copies of films- TDS U/s. 194C or 194J?

DCIT Vs. Yash Raj Films (P) Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)

DCIT Vs. Yash Raj Films (P) Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) In this case stand of assessee has been that assessee company had deducted TDS on the negative processing charges paid to Kodak India Ltd. as per the provisions of section 194J of the Act, as the negative processing involves specific tasks of editing, enhancement of quality […]...

Read More

Mitusubishi TDS Case: Delhi HC Refers matter to Chief Justice due to difference of opinion

CIT Vs. Mitsubishi Corporation India P. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)

CIT Vs. Mitsubishi Corporation India P. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) Due to difference of opinion on below issues  between Justices S Muralidhar and Prathiba M Singh, Delhi High Court, has referred the Mitusubishi’s TDS case to Chief Justice for appropriate orders:- (i) Whether the ITAT fell into error in holding that Section 40(a) (i) of [...

Read More

Search Posts by Date

December 2021