A scanned copy can be sent by email to scores@sebi.gov.in followed by hard copy to Office of the Investor Assistance and Education, Securities and Exchange Board of India, Plot No. C4-A, G Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Mumbai 400 051
Learned counsel very earnestly argued that the CCI was incorrect in firstly deciding upon the relevant market and secondly on the aspect of the respondent being a dominant player in the market. The learned counsel wanted to rely on the prospectus of the respondent which, in our view, would be an irrelevant document to decide the dominance in the market. The informant was expected to point out as to how the respondent enjoyed the dominant position in the market, by collection of evidence and the facts. That unfortunately seems not to have been done by the informant. We cannot find fault, under the circumstances, with the finding of the CCI that the respondent was not enjoying the dominant position in the market. Once that factual position is arrived at, there will be no question of contravention of Section 4 of the Act. If the respondent was not dominant, there was no question of the abuse of dominance.
No. LAD-NRO/GN/2013-14/04/5655.– In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 3 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992), the Board has established its Local Office at Lucknow under the administrative control of its Northern Regional Office at New Delhi.
Circular is issued in exercise of powers conferred under Section 11(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 to protect the interests of investors in securities and to promote the development of, and to regulate the securities market.
In exercise of the powers conferred by section 252 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Central Government has constituted the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to hear appeals against the orders passed by various authorities stated in section 253 of the Act.
CIRCULAR NO. 4/2013-Income Tax The deductor, issuing the Part A of Form No. 16 by downloading it from the TRACES Portal, shall, before issuing to the deductee authenticate the correctness of contents mentioned therein and verify the same either by using manual signature or by using digital signature in accordance with sub-rule (6) of Rule 31.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Excise & Customs, being satisfied that it is necessary and expedient so to do, hereby makes the following amendment in the
The Central Board of Excise and Customs has clarified that the activity of providing pandal and shamiana along with erection thereof and other incidental activities is a declared service [section 66E(f)] liable to service tax and not deemed sale involving “transfer of right to use goods”. The Board has explained that such an activity is […]
No security would be required to be furnished by such dealers, who apply online for registration with the Department up to the 30th of June, 2013. However, the dealers, who apply for registration manually, shall furnish the prescribed security, in the usual manner.
1. These Regulations may be called the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Mutual Funds) (Amendment) Regulations, 2013. 2. They shall come into force on the date of their publication in the Official Gazette.
