#Unjust enrichment
Log in to FollowUnjust enrichment under tax laws refers to a legal principle that prevents individuals or entities from benefiting unjustly or unfairly at the expense of the tax system. It applies when a taxpayer receives a refund or tax benefit that they are not entitled to, either due to error, misrepresentation, or non-compliance with tax laws. Tax authorities have mechanisms in place to identify and rectify cases of unjust enrichment, ensuring that taxpayers do not retain undue financial advantages. Unjust enrichment provisions serve to maintain fairness, integrity, and compliance within the tax system, and non-compliance can result in penalties, interest, or legal consequences.

CESTAT Delhi Allows KKC & SBC Refund Despite Limitation & Unjust Enrichment Objections

CESTAT Allahabad Allows Service Tax Refund After Rebutting Unjust Enrichment Through Credit Notes

Refund Allowed as Unjust Enrichment Not Established for Reversed CENVAT Credit: CESTAT Delhi

Excise Duty Refund Denied Due to Excess Realisation Over FOB Value Triggering Unjust Enrichment

Customs Refunds & Unjust Enrichment: Export Proceeds vs FOB Value, Burden of Tax & Legal Tests

Refund Claim Remanded as Adequate Opportunity not given to Prove Absence of Unjust Enrichment

Orissa HC Orders Refund of Excess BDA Consent Charges

Service Tax Paid Under RCM Post-GST Not Barred by Unjust Enrichment: Calcutta HC

Unjust Enrichment: A Comprehensive Analysis of Recent Judicial Precedents

CESTAT Bangalore Orders Unjust Enrichment Review in ₹25 Lakh Refund Case

Bank Guarantee Encashment Not Duty Payment; Unjust Enrichment Doctrine Inapplicable

CESTAT overturns refund rejection citing under Protest payment & price regulation

CESTAT Allows Refund of excise duty under protest to Allied Chemical

