Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kumar Ramanathan Vs DDIT/ADIT (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21 to 2023-24
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kumar Ramanathan Vs DDIT/ADIT (ITAT Chennai) ITAT Cancels Section 43 Penalty as Foreign Investment Came From Disclosed Sources; No Black Money Act Penalty for Inadvertent Foreign Asset Disclosure Lapse; ITAT Removes ₹10 Lakh Penalty Since Schedule FA Error Was a Technical Breach; Black Money Act Penalty Quashed as Non-Disclosure Was Not Deliberate: ITAT. In a batch of appeals for Assessment Years 2020-21 to 2023-24, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Chennai, considered whether penalty under Section 43 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Ac...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031