#Unjust enrichment
Log in to FollowUnjust enrichment under tax laws refers to a legal principle that prevents individuals or entities from benefiting unjustly or unfairly at the expense of the tax system. It applies when a taxpayer receives a refund or tax benefit that they are not entitled to, either due to error, misrepresentation, or non-compliance with tax laws. Tax authorities have mechanisms in place to identify and rectify cases of unjust enrichment, ensuring that taxpayers do not retain undue financial advantages. Unjust enrichment provisions serve to maintain fairness, integrity, and compliance within the tax system, and non-compliance can result in penalties, interest, or legal consequences.

Booking Disputed Tax as Expense in Books Does Not Prove Unjust Enrichment

Post-GST Assam Agricultural Market Cess Illegal, Refund Denied Under Unjust Enrichment Doctrine

Assam Agricultural Market Cess Struck Down Post-GST by Gauhati HC

Unjust Enrichment Not Applicable to Short-Landed Goods Uncleared for Home Consumption

Refund of Stamp Duty on cancelled agreements: Doctrine of Unjust Enrichment

Unjust Enrichment Does Not Apply to Captively Consumed Goods Without Sale

No Unjust Enrichment if Excise Duty Not Collected from Customers: CESTAT

CESTAT denies Excise Duty Refund due to Unmet Burden of Proving No Unjust Enrichment

CA Certificate Suffices to Prove Non-Pass on of Excise Duty Obligation

Incidence of Duty Borne by Appellant, Unjust to Credit Refund to Consumer Welfare Fund: CESTAT

Commissioner (A) can remand the matter to Adjudicating Authority to decide afresh

Refund claim hit by principles of unjust enrichment on failure to prove that incidence of duty not passed on

Doctrine of unjust enrichment not applies to advance service tax payment

