Corporate Law : A detailed analysis of the Supreme Court's verdict on the Tata Sons vs. Cyrus Mistry case, covering corporate governance, minority...
Corporate Law : Calls for a High Court Bench in West UP remain ignored. SC urged to intervene in judicial disparities affecting millions. Know the...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court quashes rape case, stating consensual relationship, even with breach of promise, doesn't automatically constitute ra...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court emphasizes strict scrutiny of FIRs under stringent laws like the UP Gangsters Act to prevent misuse in property ...
Custom Duty : The Supreme Court rules DRI officers as proper officers for customs under Section 28, overturning past judgments and reshaping tax...
Corporate Law : Key IBC case law updates from Oct-Dec 2024, covering Supreme Court and High Court decisions on CoC powers, resolution plans, relat...
Income Tax : Government addresses Supreme Court judgment on tax exemptions for clergy and its implications on Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs) u...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court rejects regularisation of illegal constructions, irrespective of occupancy or investments, and calls for action agai...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court Collegium recommends three advocates—Ajay Digpaul, Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, and Shwetasree Majumder—for ...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Service Tax : Supreme Court held that activity of lottery distributor doesn’t constitute a service and hence imposition of service tax on dist...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court clarified procedures for summons, warrants, and bail under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), emphasizin...
Income Tax : Supreme Court emphasizes reasonable cause for TDS non-deduction under Section 271C. Highlights interplay of Sections 4, 5, 9, and ...
Income Tax : Supreme Court reaffirms that charitable trust registration under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act should be based on proposed ac...
Corporate Law : Smt. Syeda Rahimunnisa and Syed Hyder Hussaini are wife and husband whereas the respondent no. 1(a) to 1(f) are the legal heirs of...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : No restrictions on joint bank accounts or nominations for the queer community, as clarified by the Supreme Court and RBI in August...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court of India introduces new procedures for case adjournments effective 14th February 2024, detailing strict guidelines a...
Corporate Law : Explore the updated FAQs on the implementation of the EPFO judgment dated 04.11.2022. Understand proof requirements, pension compu...
Income Tax : Comprehensive guide on CBDT's directives for AOs concerning the Abhisar Buildwell Supreme Court verdict. Dive into its implication...
Chhaya Devi Vs Union of India & Anr. (Supreme Court of Court) Supreme Court Grants Bail to petitioner Chhaya Devi in Alleged GST Evasion Case who is a widow with five daughters and claimed that her business was being looked after by the Manager who was in-charge of the business. Bail is Subject to deposit […]
Radha Krishan Industries Vs State of Himachal Pradesh (Supreme Court) SC explains law for provisional attachment of Bank Account under GST This Appeal was filed against the judgment and order of the Hon’ble Himachal Pradesh High Court (HP HC) wherein, the Court dismissed the writ petition challenging orders of provisional attachment on the ground that […]
Recently in PASL Wind Solutions v. GE Power Conversion India, the question arose as to whether two companies incorporated in India can choose a forum for arbitration outside India.
(a) only urgent matters will be listed for hearing w.e.f. 22.04.2021. and (b) the Advocate-on-Record/Party-in-Person may send signed and verified mentioning-application along with synopsis containing the grounds of urgency not exceeding one page in the fresh matter only by e-mail at the email address sc@sci.nic.in on working days by 1.00 PM (Monday to Friday) and by 11.30 AM (Saturday) and the same shall be processed for listing on the next to next working day,
State of Punjab & Ors. Vs Tecnimont Pvt. Ltd. (Supreme Court) FULL TEXT OF THE SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT/ORDER Heard Mr. Karan Bharihoke, learned Advocate for State of Punjab and Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, learned counsel for the respondent on caveat. Considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case on record, in our view, the ends […]
Boota Singh Vs State of Haryana (Supreme Court) The evidence in the present case clearly shows that the vehicle was not a public conveyance but was a vehicle belonging to accused Gurdeep Singh. The Registration Certificate of the vehicle, which has been placed on record also does not indicate it to be a Public Transport […]
F.No. 450/72/2021-Cus IV Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue (Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Custom) ***** Room No. 227B, North Block, New Delhi Dated: 16th April 2021 To, The Principal Additional Director General, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI), New Delhi Sub:- Hon’ble Supreme Court’s larger bench judgment dated 09.03.2021 in the […]
In Re Expeditious Trial of Cases Under Section 138 of N.I. Act 1881 (Supreme Court) 1) The High Courts are requested to issue practice directions to the Magistrates to record reasons before converting trial of complaints under Section 138 of the Act from summary trial to summons 2) Inquiry shall be conducted on receipt of […]
Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited Vs Bishal Jaiswal & Anr. (Supreme Court) An exhaustive judgment of the Calcutta High Court in Bengal Silk Mills Co. v. Ismail Golam Hossain Ariff, 1961 SCC OnLine Cal 128 : AIR 1962 Cal 115 [“Bengal Silk Mills”] held that an acknowledgement of liability that is made in a balance […]
Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Maharashtra (Supreme Court) FULL TEXT OF THE SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT/ORDER The principal issue which arises is when and where the High Court would be justified in passing an interim order either staying the further investigation in the FIR/complaint or interim order in the nature of ‘no coercive steps’ […]
