Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained when backed by audited books, invoices...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held that profit cannot be estimated arbitrarily when regular books of account are maintained and not rejected unde...
Income Tax : A large spousal gift exemption was denied due to failure in proving genuineness, creditworthiness, and source of funds. The ruling...
Income Tax : Income without satisfactory explanation is taxed at a special high rate under Section 115BBE. The provisions place strict liabilit...
Income Tax : ITAT held spousal gift taxable under Section 68 due to lack of evidence on genuineness, bank trail, and donor capacity despite Sec...
Finance : The Supreme Court upheld a Will executed in favour of the testator’s sister despite objections from his wife and children. The C...
Income Tax : Tribunal reiterated that credits brought forward from earlier financial years cannot ordinarily be taxed under Section 68 in subse...
Goods and Services Tax : Allahabad High Court ruled that while authorities could verify documents during transit, absence of an e-Tax Invoice did not confe...
Income Tax : The Tribunal observed that the assessee had repaid the unsecured loan along with interest after deducting TDS and the lender had o...
Income Tax : Tribunal ruled that future projections under DCF method cannot be tested solely against later actual financial performance. It obs...
Income Tax : Assessing Officers should follow the sequence as noted below for applying provisions of section 68 of the Act: Step 1: Whether the...
In the case of Wellman Logistics Pvt. Ltd Vs ACIT, ITAT Kolkata deletes income tax addition u/s 68, proving creditworthiness of share subscribers and genuineness of transactions with supported documents.
ITAT Delhi rules against Section 41(1) addition when no cessation of liability occurs, directing cancellation of a demand in the case of Late Sh. Mahender Kumar Mittal vs. ITO.
Detailed analysis of ITAT Mumbai case of Parag Motilal Savla vs ITO, focusing on lack of substantial evidence for cash loan allegations.
Delhi High Courts ruling in PCIT Vs. Pavitra Realcon Pvt. Ltd. highlights that undisclosed income assessment cant be based solely on statements made during a search.
ITAT Delhi rules that the accepted investment source by AO cannot be rectified under Section 154, quashing the income tax assessment order.
ITAT Chennai upholds addition on LTCG arising from purchase and sale of shares due to failure to produce documents. Read the full analysis of the case.
Kolkata ITAT rules in favor of Dream Valley Barter Pvt. Ltd., stating no addition under Section 68 for share premium if taxpayer proves identity and creditworthiness.
Kolkata ITAT justifies addition u/s 68 in ITO Vs Mangalvani Commercial Pvt. Ltd. for unexplained share capital & premium. Detailed analysis of the case provided.
ITAT Chennai rules that recoveries of farmers’ advances reflected in cash books are not unexplained cash credits under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act.
Read the detailed analysis of ITAT Kolkata’s dismissal of Ideal Vyapaar Pvt Ltd appeal under section 68 of the Income Tax Act due to absence of explanation for transactions.
