Income Tax : Learn the updated provisions governing rectification, assessments, reassessments, and appeals under the Income-tax Act. This guide...
Income Tax : The Income Tax Department explains how faceless assessments under Section 144B operate through the e-Filing portal without requiri...
Income Tax : Section 154 permits rectification of mistakes apparent from the record in assessment orders, intimations, and TDS/TCS processing s...
Income Tax : A detailed overview of limitation periods prescribed under the Income-tax Act reveals how missing statutory deadlines can lead to ...
Income Tax : Judicial rulings clarify that Section 54 focuses on timely investment of capital gains, not rigid legal ownership milestones. The ...
Income Tax : KSCAA has made a Representation on Challenges in Income Tax Related to Rectification Proceedings, Order Giving Effect, Delay in P...
Income Tax : Even after due efforts taken by the Government to ensure compliance relating to filing of TDS returns by the deductors, the defaul...
Income Tax : Taxpayers who are not satisfied with the outcome of processing of their Income Tax Return by the Centralized Processing Centre, Be...
Income Tax : Department introduces new facility for online submission of rectification request in cases where processing was completed by CPC B...
Income Tax : High Court restrained tax recovery, holding the Section 154 order prima facie breached natural justice by withdrawing exemption wi...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 154 cannot be used where applicability of Section 167B requires factual examination, making the issue debat...
Income Tax : ITAT directed the AO to verify Form 26AS and the corresponding income before deciding the TDS credit claim instead of denying it o...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that the CPC could not withdraw an already allowed Section 10AA deduction through rectification without recording...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi held that deduction of TDS by the payer does not by itself establish that income has accrued to the recipient. It r...
Income Tax : Taxpayers who are not satisfied with the outcome of processing of their Income Tax Return by the Centralized Processing Centre, Be...
Income Tax : Instruction No. 02/2016 Section 154 of the Act mandates that rectification order shall be passed in writing by the Income Tax auth...
Income Tax : Instruction No. 01/2016 section 154 stipulates that where application for amendment is made by assessee/deductor/collector with a...
Income Tax : 225/148/2015-ITA-II Expeditious disposal of applications for rectification under section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act) dur...
Income Tax : INSTRUCTION NO. 3/2013 Hon'ble Delhi High Court vide Judgment in case of Court On its Own Motion v. UOI and Ors. in W.P. (C) 2659/...
Gujarat High Court held that Revisional authority ought to have taken into consideration that AO has to pass best judgement assessment order without granting an opportunity of being heard. Thus, matter remanded back to AO for de novo consideration.
ITAT Pune rules late fee u/s 234E for TDS returns prior to June 1, 2015, invalid, citing lack of legal mechanism before Finance Act 2015.
Delhi High Court rules in favor of Square Vision India Pvt Ltd, condoning a one-day delay in ITR filing for AY 2016-17, citing genuine hardship and setting aside PCIT’s rejection.
The Delhi High Court directs tax authorities to process TDS credit for AY 2007-08 based on taxpayer-provided details when TRACES data is unavailable, upholding taxpayer rights.
Delhi High Court rules Income Tax’s CPC cannot repeatedly rectify intimations under Section 143(1)(a) after initial rectification, remanding a case for review.
Chandigarh ITAT allows 80P deduction for Habrol Co-op Society, ruling against disallowance due to a clerical error in tax return. Section 80A(5) not applicable.
Department replied on 29 November 2018, and assessee kept following up for the refund with interest. But no further response came. Revenue rejected the refund, saying the 2018 reply was not a valid order under the Act.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that issue of applicability of section 115JB to National Dairy Development Board is debatable and not a mistake apparent from record hence rectification order passed is beyond the scope of section 154 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that it is the duty imposed on the Assessing Officer to complete the rectification process within six months. Thus, by remanding the matter back to the file of Assessing Officer, it is directed to complete the rectification within one month.
CESTAT Delhi held that re-assessment will come to an end once the goods are exported in case of Shipping Bills and once the officer gives an order clearing the goods for home consumption in case of imports.
