ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata quashed the assessment as the jurisdictional Assessing Officer did not issue the mandatory notice under Section 143(2...
Income Tax : Bangalore ITAT deleted Section 40(a)(ia), notional interest, ICDS and Section 68 additions, citing Form 26A compliance and evident...
Income Tax : Bangalore ITAT remanded FD interest addition, directing verification of fund ownership and held Form 26AS alone is not determinati...
Income Tax : Bangalore ITAT held entire alleged bogus purchases cannot be added where sales are accepted, restricting the addition to 1.15% pro...
Income Tax : Bangalore ITAT held TP adjustments apply only to international AE transactions and upheld verified capacity, working capital and o...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
Mumbai ITAT remands case of unexplained 4kg gold investment, citing improper rejection of assessee’s additional evidence under Rule 46A by CIT(A).
ITAT Ahmedabad rules that Section 13(1)(b), which addresses trusts for specific communities, is irrelevant at the registration stage. The provision applies only during assessment to determine exemptions.
The ITAT Kolkata rules on the Nabiul Industrial Metal case, deeming an assessment invalid due to jurisdictional issues with the faceless assessment scheme’s implementation date.
ITAT Ahmedabad partially allows an appeal by Bhikhabhai Hirabhai Patel, reducing late filing fees after ruling that TDS is not applicable to property transfers under Rs. 50 lakhs per transferee.
ITAT Bangalore recalls an order in the case of Smt. M.K. Rajeshwari, ruling that a Single Member Bench should not have heard the appeal as the assessed income exceeded the Rs. 50 lakh limit.
ITAT Ahmedabad deletes ₹8 Cr addition u/s 68, holding firm provided sufficient evidence; partner’s non-response to notice u/s 133(6) not held against assessee.
The ITAT Cochin has ruled that an Assessing Officer must refer a property’s fair market value to a DVO. Failure to do so invalidates any capital gains addition.
The ITAT Chennai has quashed a reassessment against Ambattur Constructions, ruling that a mere audit objection without fresh material is not a valid basis for reopening a completed assessment.
ITAT Raipur held that addition made on account of unexplained out of books cash transaction merely on the basis of certain information without cogent evidence or plausible reasoning has not substance to survive in eye of law. Accordingly, addition deleted.
ITAT Mumbai held that adjustments made by Central Processing Centre [CPC] under section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act is deleted since the entire adjustments were on account of technical glitches of the CPC system.
