Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Suryanarayanan Ramachandran Vs ITO (ITAT Cochin)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-2016
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Suryanarayanan Ramachandran Vs ITO (ITAT Cochin) Failure to refer FMV to DVO renders capital gains addition invalid; AO’s reverse FMV method rejected; DVO route mandatory Assessee sold a property inherited from his father  for Rs.2.80 crore &  adopted fair market value of the property as on 01.04.1981 at Rs.4,89,900 & the cost of improvement at Rs.2 lakh in the financial year 1990-1991. AO   adopted the fair market value at Rs.2,12,108 by adopting backward calculation based on the value as per the sale deed. AO adopted the cost of improvement at Rs.1,50,000 as against Rs.2 lakh ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Raipur: Assessee Cannot Be Denied Section 115BAB Benefit Due to Department’s Internal Allocation of Appeal Between JCIT(A) and CIT(A) CIT(A) Must Decide Jurisdiction Before Remanding Reassessment to AO: ITAT Raipur Buyer’s Denial Alone Can’t Justify Section 69A Addition: ITAT Hyderabad Only Net Income of Trust Taxable Despite Section 11 Denial: ITAT Hyderabad Section 271D Penalty Deleted on Journal Entry Loan Transfer: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031