ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained when backed by audited books, invoices...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that non-specification of the precise statutory charge under sections 270A(2) and 270A(9) violated principles o...
Income Tax : The Delhi ITAT held that institutions engaged in preservation of environment fall under a specific charitable limb under Section 2...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the Section 54F claim after noting that medical issues and portal difficulties prevented timely filing of ...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : Learn about hybrid hearing guidelines of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Indore Bench, effective from October 9, 2023, offeri...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that reassessment under Section 147 was invalid as the Assessing Officer failed to show independent applicatio...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that cash deposits during demonetization could not be treated as unexplained income since the amounts were re...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that revision under section 263 was not sustainable where the Assessing Officer had already conducted extensive v...
Income Tax : ITAT Nagpur held that nominal donations received in small amounts could not be treated as non-voluntary contributions merely becau...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted the addition under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) after holding that a 2.3% variation between agreement value and stamp...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
The ITAT Delhi has set aside the CIT(A)’s deletion of a ₹2.32 crore addition made under Section 68, citing a violation of Rule 46A as new evidence was admitted without giving the Assessing Officer a chance to examine it.
ITAT Indore held that AO made addition towards unexplained deposited without being aware of possession of two PAN by single person-assessee. Accordingly, matter remanded to the file of AO with imposition of cost of Rs. 7,000/-.
ITAT Raipur restores appeal dismissed ex-parte by CIT(A), finding no proof of notice served via physical mode as opted by assessee in Form 35.
ITAT Kolkata confirms ₹31.15 lakh loan repayment is not unexplained cash credit, upholding deletion of addition for New Charan Kanwal Finance.
The ITAT Mumbai has ruled against an arbitrary 3% net profit addition for a liquor dealer. The court found the addition was based on assumptions, not evidence, as the books were audited
The ITAT Ahmedabad has restored a case involving unexplained cash deposits of Rs. 18.32 lakh to the Assessing Officer, citing a failure to examine debit entries and additional evidence, and condoning a 323-day delay in appeal filing.
ITAT Panaji sets aside NFAC’s dismissal of tax appeal for one-day delay, citing hyper-technical grounds and affirming timely filing.
ITAT Cochin provides partial relief to Palmshore Hotels, remanding the case to AO for fresh adjudication on business income classification and Section 43B disallowance.
ITAT Patna remands an ex-parte tax assessment case to the AO for fresh adjudication, granting the absent assessee another hearing opportunity.
Addition made by AO in the hands of the trust was not justified as income from investments was taxable in the settlor’s hands and exempt under the India-UAE Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).
