ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : ITAT Special Bench held that omission of scrutiny category in a Section 143(2) notice is a procedural defect curable under Section...
Income Tax : ITAT held section 35D(2)(c) applies only to companies and upheld disallowance of REIT's claim for IPO and listing expense amortisa...
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the appeal after holding that mere upload of an order on the ITBA portal is not valid service under Sectio...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Mumbai ITAT condoned a 917-day delay and directed that bogus purchase addition be limited to the gross profit element where sales ...
Income Tax : Mumbai ITAT restored section 12AB registration and 80G approval applications for fresh adjudication after finding relevant aspects...
Income Tax : Bengaluru ITAT restored the matter to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication on reassessment and section 80P issues after setting aside the...
Income Tax : Bengaluru ITAT allowed deduction of ₹1.475 crore success fee under section 48(i), holding advisory services for share divestment...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi deleted additions under section 41(1) and held that non-response to notices alone could not render supported sundry c...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed rectification under Section 254(2), correcting factual errors and granting Section 54EC deduction of ₹1 crore ...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Shri Abdul Hamid Vs ITO (ITAT Gauhati) Important facts of the case: 1) The assessee was engaged in the retail business of eggs & was also the partner of a partnership firm M/s Nihar Enterprises. 2) During the Regular Assessment Proceedings for Assessment year, 2014-15 AO found that a Bank Account @ Central Bank of […]
The issue under consideration is whether the exemption u/s 11 will be allowed against the interest income, exchange gain, and miscellaneous income to the Confederation of Indian Textile Industry?
The issue which is arising in the present appeal is whether there is DAPE. The Assessing Officer has alleged the existence of DAPE on account of alleged marketing activities undertaken by Indian entity on behalf of the assessee company.
Assessment order passed by the A.O u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144C(3), in the hands of M/s Satyam Computers Services Ltd., i.e an entity that was non-existent on the date on which the assessment order was passed, had been held by the Tribunal in its aforesaid order as non-est in the eyes of law, therefore, the same does not survive and on the same terms is quashed.
ITAT held that AO can scrutinize the valuation report and he can determine a fresh valuation either by himself or by calling a determination from an independent valuer to confront the assessee but the basis has to be DCF method and he cannot change the method of valuation which has been opted by the assessee.
ACIT Vs Shri Gurdeep Singh (ITAT Chandigarh) The intention behind enacting provisions of section 2(22) (e) are that closely held companies (i.e. companies in which public are not substantially interested), which are controlled by a group of members, even though the company has accumulated profits would not distribute such profit as dividend because if so […]
The fact that provision made at the end was reversed in the beginning of next accounting year showed that there was no income accrued. Mere entries in books of account did not establish accrual of income in the hands of payee and hence there was no liability on assessee-company to deduct merely on the provisions made at year end.
Shri B.A.Moideen Bava Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) The issue raised by assessee is on merits is regarding peak credits in unaccounted bank accounts of assessee’s. It has been submitted that peak credit has to be computed on the basis of actual deposits and withdrawal and not on the basis of cash deposit alone. Accordingly, we […]
Appeal filed by assessee dismissed due to ignorant attitude of the assessee towards appeal.
Bhagwan Keshu Sakhare Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) The issue under consideration is whether CIT is correct in denial of exemption u/s 54B of the Act? In the present case, the case of assessee is selected for limited scrutiny under CASS for the reason of “Deduction claimed under the head capital gains”. After claiming deduction for […]
