ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : ITAT Special Bench held that omission of scrutiny category in a Section 143(2) notice is a procedural defect curable under Section...
Income Tax : ITAT held section 35D(2)(c) applies only to companies and upheld disallowance of REIT's claim for IPO and listing expense amortisa...
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the appeal after holding that mere upload of an order on the ITBA portal is not valid service under Sectio...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held disputed salary is taxable only if it became due and remanded the matter to verify the employment terms and em...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi deleted the section 69A addition of ₹33.50 lakh after holding the intercepted cash formed part of the disclosed prope...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi deleted Section 270A penalty as notices lacked specific Section 270A(9) charge and the expenditure claim involved a deb...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored six Section 153A search assessment appeals to the AO, subject to ₹50,000 cost per appeal for repeated no...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore deleted a Section 270A penalty as the notice and penalty order failed to specify the exact statutory limb of under-...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed rectification under Section 254(2), correcting factual errors and granting Section 54EC deduction of ₹1 crore ...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
ACIT Vs Ravi Parkash Aggarwal (ITAT Delhi) Primarily, we find that the reasons recorded by the assessee are too sketchy and does not instill any confidence with regard to the reasons recorded for reopening. It is not even clear whether the assessee has received entries pertaining to loans or purchases. The details of the report […]
Sharda Mandir High School Vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai) The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has ruled that the unregistered Association of Persons formed by agreement merging two charitable Trusts eligible for exemption under Income Tax. The appellant Sharda Mandir High School which is an Association of person (AOP), against order passed by […]
DCIT Vs Sanverwala Jewellers Pvt Ltd (ITAT Indore) In this case Assessing Officer merely doubted the investment made by the share applicants for the reason that they did not submit any proof regarding agricultural activities done by them. It is therefore quite evident that the Assessing Officer himself accepted the identity of the share applicants […]
ACIT Vs ISMT Limited (ITAT Pune) It is settled position of law that the Assessing Officer cannot rely on the same books of accounts which are rejected for the purpose of making any other additions as held by the Hon’ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of Indwell Constructions vs. CIT, 232 ITR 776 […]
Procter & Gamble Health Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Undisputedly, the assessing officer had disallowed 50% of the total cost incurred by the assessee towards free samples in the relevant assessment years. Whereas, simply relying upon the decision of the learned DRP in assessment year 2013-14, learned Commissioner (Appeals) has restricted the disallowance to 20% […]
ACIT Vs Gujarat Ambuja Exports Ltd. (ITAT Ahmedabad) The ld.counsel for the assessee at the very outset submitted that as far as amounts mentioned under the head interest on NSC and interest on staff loan is concerned they are not in dispute. The deduction claimed under section 80IC with regard to both these items have […]
Ajit Lalwani Vs ACIT (TDS) (ITAT Indore) In the instant of two appeals assessee has challenged the levy of penalty u/s 271CA of the Act for the violation of provisions of section 206C of the Act. We find that the assessee has furnished copy of form 27BA along with copy of Income Tax return of […]
Ashish Tandon v. ACIT (2019) 103 taxmann.com 315 / 199 TTJ 137 / 176 DTR 353 (Ahd.) (Trib.). HELD THAT – Sale of a technical concept, that the assessee developed on his own, with respect to website malware monitoring, assessable as business income. FACTS OF CASE; A technical concept was conceptualized by assessee-employee to safeguard […]
It not the entire sales consideration which is to be brought to tax but only the profit attributable on the total unrecorded sales consideration which alone can be subject to income tax
GRI Renewable Industries S.L. Vs ACIT (IT) (ITAT Pune) It is seen that the assessee offered its income from ‘royalties’ and ‘fees for technical services’ on gross basis, albeit at the concessional rate of tax. The assessee claimed that a sum of Rs.35.67 lakh was received as reimbursement of expenses which was not liable to […]
