ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that cash deposits during demonetisation cannot be treated as unexplained when backed by audited books, invoices...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that non-specification of the precise statutory charge under sections 270A(2) and 270A(9) violated principles o...
Income Tax : The Delhi ITAT held that institutions engaged in preservation of environment fall under a specific charitable limb under Section 2...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that CIT(A) cannot enhance income under Section 251 on matters not considered by the Assessing Officer during as...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the Section 54F claim after noting that medical issues and portal difficulties prevented timely filing of ...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : Learn about hybrid hearing guidelines of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Indore Bench, effective from October 9, 2023, offeri...
Income Tax : The ITAT Ahmedabad held that reassessment under Section 147 was invalid because the Assessing Officer reopened the case for fictit...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that tax authorities cannot reject documentary evidence solely by labeling the explanation as an afterthought. P...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore dismissed the Revenue’s appeal after holding that the Assessing Officer failed to provide adequate reasons for de...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) should not be decided before disposal of the related quantum appe...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that two sale deeds represented the same transaction because one was merely an amendment correcting a survey num...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
Main issue involved in the matter was that Employees contribution to VPF was deposited after due dates under explanation to section 36(1)(va) but before the end of relevant previous year is allowable deduction or not.
Jansampark Advertising & Marketing P. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Settled position of law as held by the Hon’ble High Court in the case of Haryana Acrylic Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner of Income Tax 308 ITR 38 [ Delhi] is that the requirement of recording the reasons, communicating the same to the assessee, enabling the […]
DCIT Vs Welspun Projects Limited (ITAT Ahmedabad) It was also argued by the learned DR that there is no provision under the Act for amortization of the expenses. Therefore, the assessee should not be allowed the deduction of the expenses amortized in the year under consideration. Undoubtedly, the assessee has incurred the expenses on the […]
Vodafone Idea Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) In this case Learned Departmental Representative could not disputed the proposition that hearing of the appeal after the last stay could not take place because of no fault of the assessee. Accordingly, we extend the stay for a period of six months from the date of this order […]
World Courier (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) M/s. World Courier (India) Pvt. Ltd. (Appellant) has filed an appeal against order dated April 24, 2017 of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) on the issue whether Revenue authorities were justified in disallowing sum paid by the Appellant as software maintenance charges to its overseas […]
Ajay Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) The solitary ground raised by the assessee in this appeal pertains to disallowance of Rs. 10,47,025/- incurred by the assessee during the year as ground rent on lease hold properties to L& DO. According to the AO this amount is not allowable u/s 43B of the Income […]
SJM International Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) The conclusion of the Assessing Officer at the end of the reasons recorded as noted above is contradictory. In the first two lines, the Assessing Officer has recorded the finding that the sum of Rs.2,35,00,000/- has escaped assessment but in the last two lines, he has recorded that […]
Jaswantlal J Shah Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) In ground No.1 of appeal, the assessee has impugned the validity of assessment order on the ground that the Assessing Officer has no jurisdiction to pass the assessment order. The short contention of the assessee is that before changing jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer under section 127 of […]
Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) From the stage of the assessment proceeding itself, it is the claim of the assessee that the term ‘tax’, as defined under section 2(43) of the Act would only include taxes chargeable under the Indian Income Tax Act. It is the further case of the assessee that […]
ACIT Vs Starwood (M) International Inc. (ITAT Delhi) Conclusion: In present facts of the case, while dismissing Revenue’s appeal, it was held that to prove case under Article 12 of India-US DTAA, no specification was given or limb was satisfied by the Revenue. Further, it was also held that no new facts could be entertained […]
