ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : ITAT held section 35D(2)(c) applies only to companies and upheld disallowance of REIT's claim for IPO and listing expense amortisa...
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore restored the appeal after holding that mere upload of an order on the ITBA portal is not valid service under Sectio...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted disallowances on bonus provision reversal and brokerage provision, allowed Section 80G deduction, and allowed ...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that a genuine business expenditure cannot be disallowed merely because it was booked under an incorrect accounti...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore quashed reassessment under Sections 148 and 150, holding it was time-barred and unsupported by any finding or direc...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai allowed Section 87A rebate on STCG taxable under Section 111A for AY 2024-25 and directed CPC to recompute tax liabili...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai allowed carry forward and set-off of AY 2019-20 capital loss, holding that an inadvertent Schedule CFL omission could ...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune allowed rectification under Section 254(2), correcting factual errors and granting Section 54EC deduction of ₹1 crore ...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Unlocking the essence of capital vs. revenue expenditure through Faurecia Emissions vs. DCIT, ITAT Chennais verdict on royalty payments for technical know-how.
ITAT Delhi held that assessment order passed in violation of the directions of Dispute Resolution Penal (DRP) is against the provisions of sub-section (10) and (13) of section 144C of the Act and hence liable to be quashed
ITAT Bangalore held that expenditure towards ESOP is wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business and it satisfies all the conditions referred to in section 37(1). Accordingly, expenditure towards ESOP is eligible for deduction u/s 37 of the Income Tax Act.
Held that education cess paid by the respondent-assessee is not allowable as an expenditure under Section 37 read with 40(a)(ii) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi held that property sold is to be taxed under Capital gain as the property was held for considerable longer period of time and assessee is not engaged into systemic real estate business activity.
ITAT Mumbai held that there is no element of technical knowledge, experience, skill knowhow or process in the rendering of brokerage services. Therefore, the payment of brokerage by the assessee to the brokers not being covered as FTS-FIS is not taxable in India either pursuant to Sec. 9(1)(vii)
Distribution revenue earned by assessee had already offered income as business income in terms of the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) holding that 10% of the advertising and subscription revenue received from India should be deemed to be the net profit chargeable to tax in India, therefore, the additions made by AO were deleted.
ITAT Mumbai held that the Department cannot swallow tax paid by the assessee and deny credit of tax deducted, which pertains to the assessee. AO cannot simply decline the credit of TDS. AO directed to allow the TDS credit after due verification.
ITAT delete penalty levied for failure to get accounts audited and for filing tax audit report belatedly, on the grounds that the assessee was prevented by reasonable cause due to its pathetic condition and heavy losses incurred in its business.
Income which was sought to be taxed in the hands of the assessee had already been taxed as income in the hands of another entity so no penalty leviable
