ITAT Judgment contain Income Tax related Judgments from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Across India which includes ITAT Mumbai, Chennai, Delhi, Kolkutta, Hyderabad etc.
Income Tax : Article examines whether the MLI Principal Purpose Test has domestic effect under Section 90(1) following Nestlé SA and Sky High ...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Income Tax : ITAT held that Section 54 exemption must be examined separately for each residential house sold. Aggregating gains from multiple t...
Income Tax : ITAT held that delayed filing of Form 10B cannot defeat Section 11 exemption if the audit report is available before processing un...
Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held Section 2(47)(v) inapplicable as the JDA did not satisfy Section 53A conditions, deleting capital gains for AY...
Income Tax : The issue concerns massive backlog in ITAT caused by unfilled positions and delayed appointments. The intervention highlights that...
Income Tax : A representation seeks doubling the SMC threshold due to inflation and higher dispute values. The key takeaway is that increasing ...
Income Tax : The tribunal held that a gift deed alone cannot establish legitimacy under Section 68. It directed fresh scrutiny of the donor’s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi partly allowed the assessee’s appeals and dismissed the Revenue’s appeal in Section 263 revision and related assess...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi deleted Section 11 disallowance and allowed exemption claims, holding denial under Section 13 is restricted to the exte...
Income Tax : ITAT Cochin quashed Section 148 reassessment for AY 2015-16, holding the notice time-barred under Section 149 despite Section 148A...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi deleted the Section 69 addition after accepting the cash deposit explanation and holding Section 69 was wrongly invoked...
Income Tax : ITAT Raipur deleted Section 68 additions on demonetisation cash deposits, accepted the disclosed business source and held Section ...
Income Tax : The ITAT Delhi has revised its hearing notice protocols. Physical notices will now be sent only once, with subsequent dates availa...
Income Tax : ITAT Chandigarh held that ITO Ward-3(1), Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue notice to an NRI and hence consequently the asses...
Income Tax : Central Government is pleased to appoint Shri G. S. Pannu, Vice-President of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, as President of th...
Income Tax : Ministry of Finance notified rules for appointment of members in various tribunals on 12.02.2020 in which practice of judicial and...
Income Tax : Bhagyalaxmi Conclave Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In the remand report, the AO clearly stated that notice u/s 143(2) of the Ac...
ITAT Chennai rules that filing Form 67 for Foreign Tax Credit is directory, not mandatory, dismissing Revenue’s appeal against relief granted to the assessee.
Analysis of ITAT Jaipur’s decision in Shiv Vegpro Pvt. Ltd. Vs PCIT, addressing Section 263, delay condonation, and tax assessment disputes for AY 2017-18.
In the case of Eapen George Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore), the Tribunal examined the non-resident’s right to be heard during reassessment proceedings and the rejection of additional evidence.
Detailed analysis of the ITAT Jaipur decision in Dinesh Kumar Chaurasia Vs ACIT on unexplained investments, Section 263 jurisdiction, and procedural lapses.
In the matter abovementioned ITAT upheld the jurisdiction u/s 263 exercised by PCIT, is right as twin condition of section 263 are fulfilled.
ITAT Mumbai sets aside CIT(E)’s rejection of a trust’s 12A and 80G registration applications due to incomplete documents, restoring the case for reconsideration.
Tribunal ruled that the deduction was valid under Section 43B, as the payments were made in the relevant assessment year after the disputes were settled through the amnesty schemes.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that entire assessments has been restored to the file of CIT(A) for de novo consideration since assessee was found to be absolutely non-cooperative and took every step to thwart/stonewall the assessment proceedings.
ITAT Ahmedabad affirms CIT(A)’s deletion of ₹12.92 crore tax addition under Section 40A(3), relying on past gross profit rates and valid agricultural purchases.
In the matter abovementioned ITAT allowed appeal of the assessee by holding that assessee is eligible for claim of deduction u/s.80P(2)(a)(i) that all its income is from members.
