Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : The Bombay High Court held that merely organising protests or morchas against government decisions cannot justify externment. It r...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court held that an unnatural death in police custody attracts constitutional liability under Article 21, even if ca...
Income Tax : The Calcutta High Court quashed a Section 143(3) assessment after finding that the assessee was denied a meaningful opportunity of...
Corporate Law : Madras HC held morphed obscene images are a serious attack on a woman's privacy and dignity. It directed prompt police action and ...
Corporate Law : The Chhattisgarh High Court upheld the acquittal after finding the relationship was consensual. A later refusal to marry did not e...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC has directed CBDT to ensure that there is a mandatory one-month gap between date for furnishing tax audit reports (unde...
Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court granted a one-month extension for filing TARs under Section 44AB for AY 2025-26, citing delayed audit utility...
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court is hearing a petition from the Chartered Accountants Association regarding persistent glitches on the new I...
Income Tax : Karnataka High Court held that reopening a completed scrutiny assessment without fresh tangible material is impermissible as it am...
Income Tax : Karnataka High Court held that Section 14A disallowance must be based on actual expenditure and remanded the matter for fresh comp...
Income Tax : Delhi High Court ruled that expenditure cannot be disallowed under Section 14A unless exempt income is actually earned in the rele...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC held societies only recognize members for administration, not title. Membership cannot be denied over unresolved ownersh...
Corporate Law : Allahabad HC ruled that cyber crime investigations must comply with BNSS requirements, including furnishing the FIR and specifying...
Income Tax : The Court held that membership cannot be granted where the underlying flats do not exist and are merely refuge areas. It ruled tha...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Tata Communications Ltd. Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER of BOMBAY HIGH COURT Bombay high court on unlawful illegal refund adjustment u/s 245 by tax authorities held that Interim relief granted by Bombay HC vide order dated 26th March, 2020 also applies to Income Tax Refund and refund cannot be […]
Bytedance (India) Technology Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF BOMBAY HIGH COURT 1. The petitioner is before the court aggrieved by two communications both dated 18th March, 2021 issued by the Principal Director General of Goods and Service Tax Intelligence, Mumbai (“DGGI”) provisionally attaching petitioner’s bank […]
Supreme Court Kridhan Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Venkatesan Sankaranarayan & Ors. [CA No. 3299/2020] As resolution plan was not implemented, the Adjudicating Authority (AA) ordered liquidation of the CD. On appeal, the NCLAT allowed the RA to make certain deposits within certain time. On failure to deposit the amounts, the NCLAT upheld the order of […]
Income Tax Department Vs Sri D K Shivakumar (Karnataka High Court) The gist of the offence under section 276C(1) is the wilfull attempt to evade any tax, penalty or interest chargeable or imposable or under reports of the income. What is made punishable is “attempt to evade tax, penalty or interest” and not the “actual […]
Britannia Industries Ltd Vs ITC Ltd. (Delhi High Court) FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF DELHI HIGH COURT 1. On 1 1th September, 2020, the Trademark Registry registered the following trademark in favour of the plaintiff M/s Britannia Industries Ltd., in respect of “biscuits, bread, buns, rolls, bakery products, coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, […]
Omaxe New Chandigarh Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Ors (Delhi High Court) We are of the view that ‘voluntary statements’ recorded before the Senior Intelligence Officer cannot constitute pre-show cause notice consultation as envisaged in the paragraph 5 of the 2017 Master Circular. Consultation entails discussion and deliberation. There is back and […]
H.R. Enterprises Vs State Of Rajasthan (Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur) High Court observed that The assessees and the authorities under CGST/SGST/IGST are giving their own interpretation of the provisions of the Act relating to Goods in Transit. All stake holders are treading in the new GST regime with uncertainties as the path is comparatively […]
Union of India Vs AT And S India Pvt. Ltd (Karnataka High Court) The facts of the case reveal that respondent No.1 before this Court has challenged the order dated 31.01.2020 issued by the Principal Commissioner of Central GST and Central Excise whereby the request of the petitioner for availing TRAN-1 credit has been rejected […]
Refund of excise duty paid under protest if any borne by assessee had to be made only within a period of limitation prescribed under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 notwithstanding the fact that assessee became aware of the wrong payment of tax only after the Central Board of Excise and Customs issued clarification bearing reference Order No. 2/1/2002-ST dated 24.4.2002. Thus, the period prescribed under section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 had expired long before the above were clarification was issued.
ONGC Tripura Power Company Ltd. Vs State of Tripura (Tripura High Court) In a significant legal victory for electricity-generating companies, the Tripura High Court has held State Governments cannot levy electricity duty on inter-State sale of electricity. ONGC Tripura Corporation Ltd had challenged the provisions of the Tripura Electricity Duty Act, 2019 (TEDA) by a […]
