Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that judicial officers cannot be intimidated for delivering judgments since every judicial orde...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Corporate Law : The Bombay High Court held that merely organising protests or morchas against government decisions cannot justify externment. It r...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court held that an unnatural death in police custody attracts constitutional liability under Article 21, even if ca...
Income Tax : The Calcutta High Court quashed a Section 143(3) assessment after finding that the assessee was denied a meaningful opportunity of...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC has directed CBDT to ensure that there is a mandatory one-month gap between date for furnishing tax audit reports (unde...
Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court granted a one-month extension for filing TARs under Section 44AB for AY 2025-26, citing delayed audit utility...
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court is hearing a petition from the Chartered Accountants Association regarding persistent glitches on the new I...
Corporate Law : Calcutta HC held that the three-month delay in executing a PITNDPS detention order was justified by administrative procedures and ...
Income Tax : Bombay HC upheld ITAT's order, holding reassessment under Section 148 unsustainable as full reasons were not supplied and relied o...
Corporate Law : The Court ruled that, without a transfer application and parallel insolvency proceedings, shifting a winding-up case to NCLT was u...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras High Court remitted the GST assessment for fresh adjudication, directing deposit of the entire disputed tax before reconsid...
Corporate Law : Allahabad High Court held Cyber Cell cannot freeze an entire bank account and sought safeguards where an advocate's professional f...
Income Tax : The Court held that membership cannot be granted where the underlying flats do not exist and are merely refuge areas. It ruled tha...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Jagadish Nangineni Vs Directorate of Enforcement (Punjab and Haryana High Court) Conclusion: Since ED alleged that both assessees were actively involved in the planning and execution of all the transactions involving repeated transfer of funds and were accused of serious economic offences, therefore, grant of anticipatory bail to assessees at this stage would certainly result […]
While before grant of bail the Public Prosecutor was required to be given an opportunity to oppose the plea for bail and that where the Public Prosecutor opposed such plea the Court could order release of the accused on bail only after recording a satisfaction that there were reasonable grounds for believing that the person to be released was not guilty of the offence he was accused of and that while on bail he was not likely to commit any offence.
Since there was no material to proceed against assessee under Sections 3 and 4 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 and High Court should quash the proceedings if it came to the conclusion that allowing the proceedings to continue, would be an abuse of the process of the Court and that the ends of justice required that the proceedings be required to be quashed.
Pankaj Sharma Vs Union of India (Patna High Court) The Hon’ble Patna High Court in Pankaj Sharma vs. UOI & Ors. [Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7431 dated June 01, 2021] set aside the order dismissing the appeal of the assessee passed by the Revenue Department, on the ground that the same is cryptic in […]
MSPL Ltd Vs PCIT (Bombay High Court) Is the President of ITAT immune from transferring live appeals from one bench of the ITAT to the other bench outside the headquarters? The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in a very recent judgement has decided the bar on the transfer of live appeals from one bench of the […]
Society For Tax Analysis And Research Vs Union Of India & Ors. (Delhi High Court) The Delhi High Court, while considering a petition filed by Society for Tax Analysis and Research, a two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court has held that a law firm cannot report the details of the cases through their website/blog […]
GST Department can not force directly to the Buyer to reverse the Input Tax Credit, Because Supplier did not Deposit to the Government kitty (Section 16 of CGST Act 2017) I hope everything is fine on your side in this Covid -19 Pandemic situation. There are some defaulter seller in the market who collect the […]
Supreme Court Laxmi Pat Surana Vs. Union Bank of India & Anr. [CA No. 2734/2020] An FC had extended a credit to a proprietorship firm, which failed to repay the amount. The credit was guaranteed by a company. The FC filed an application under section 7 for CIRP of the CD (guarantor company). The application […]
High Court of Tripura, in Shri Sentu Dey Vs. The State of Tripura & Ors has proclaimed that a Magistrate cannot revert to calling for police investigation in a case where he has previously taken cognizance of the offences.
Absolute Rule of minimum four weeks gap between rejection of objection and further proceedings of section 147 , Bombay HC(296 ITR 90) Bombay High Court Asian Paints Ltd. vs Deputy Commissioner Of … on 29 January, 2007 Equivalent citations: 2008 296 ITR 90 Bom Bench: S Radhakrishnan, J Devadhar JUDGMENT 1. Heard learned Counsel for […]
