Goods and Services Tax : The Gujarat High Court ruled that Input Tax Credit cannot be claimed unless the supplier has actually paid tax to the Government u...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN has implemented automated interest computation through the Tax Liability Break-up mechanism in GSTR-3B to identify delayed ta...
Goods and Services Tax : The Delhi High Court ruled that GST authorities can issue a single SCN covering multiple financial years under Sections 73 and 74 ...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court observed that filing GST returns is the statutory mechanism for disclosing tax liability. Failure to file returns w...
Goods and Services Tax : The operators avoided traditional hacking and instead used structural loopholes in website optimisation. The incident shows how te...
Goods and Services Tax : A PIB backgrounder explains how nine years of GST have expanded the taxpayer base, increased collections, and simplified India's i...
Goods and Services Tax : A GST Bar Association has sought a three-month extension for filing GSTAT appeals, citing procedural complexities and evolving fil...
Goods and Services Tax : Authorities uncovered fraudulent ITC claims exceeding ₹8 crore without actual supply of goods. The ruling highlights that ITC is...
Goods and Services Tax : A tax audit official was arrested while accepting ₹5 lakh as part of an alleged bribe to reduce a proposed tax demand. The case ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Delhi South CGST Commissionerate has arrested a key person linked to three firms for allegedly evading ₹16.30 crore in GST t...
Goods and Services Tax : The Supreme Court held that an accused cannot be denied copies of documents forming part of the chargesheet merely because prosecu...
Goods and Services Tax : The court quashed orders reversing ITC that were based solely on limitation under Section 16(4). It held that the amendment insert...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court set aside a GST demand after finding that tax liability was discharged under CGST and SGST instead of IGST. Authorities ...
Goods and Services Tax : The question whether the contractual work was an exempt construction activity or taxable manpower supply required fact-finding, wh...
Goods and Services Tax : Kerala High Court held that reliefs sought in writ cannot be entertained as debit of penalty from amount receivable could only be ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Central Government has authorized the GSTAT Principal Bench, New Delhi, to hear appeals under Section 101B of the CGST Act. Th...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC has amended Notification No. 9/2025-Central Tax (Rate) to revise tariff entries in GST schedules in line with Finance Act, 20...
Goods and Services Tax : GST Portal revises interest computation in GSTR-3B, factoring minimum cash ledger balance and auto-populating non-editable interes...
Goods and Services Tax : Raigad CGST Commissionerate issued SOPs for taxpayer grievance redressal, introducing open house meetings, local seminars, and esc...
Goods and Services Tax : GST notification updates the definition of Nominated Agency in Notification No. 26/2018-CT (Rate). The new definition refers to L...
Several types of GST refund : Excess payment of tax due to mistake or inadvertence, Excess balance in Electronic Cash Ledger, Export with payment of IGST or under Bond/ LUT, Supplies made to SEZ unit/developer on payment of IGST or under Bond/LUT, Inverted duty structure, Deemed Exports, Persons holding UIN and Miscellaneous refunds
SOP for Taxpayers-How to furnish reply in ASMT-11 against a Notice in ASMT-10 In order to furnish a reply in FORM GST ASMT-11 against a notice u/s. 61 of the CGST Act, 2017 in FORM GST ASMT-10, NOTICE FOR INTIMATING DISCRIPANCIES IN THE RETURN AFTER SCRUTINY, the following steps have to be performed. 1. As […]
We have received the aforesaid notice/advisory in which we have been directed to deposit the interest for late payment of Taxes (GST). In this regard we would like to submit as follows:- That the aforesaid notice does not indicate the section or provision under which the same has been issued. It appears that the aforesaid notice has not been issued as per the provisions of law.
During investigation, it was revealed that M/s Fortune Graphics Limited, M/s Reema Polychem Private Limited & M/s Ganpati Enterprises have issued invoices worth more than Rs 4,198 Crores wherein Tax amount of more than Rs 660 Crores has been fraudulently passed on as ITC credit to buyers of such fake invoices.
Ministry of Finance Major Racket of Fake Invoicing of Rs.7896 Crore Busted Involving Network of 23 Shell Companies Two Accused Arrested & Remanded to 14 Days Judicial Custody The officers of Anti Evasion wing of Central Tax, Delhi West Commissionerate have busted a major racket of fake invoicing of Rs.7896 crore involving fraudulent Input Tax […]
1. In many industries (e.g. automobiles, FMCG, etc.) various kinds of discounts/incentives are given to the distributors on achieving certain sales targets. Issue therefore for discussion and analysis is whether such discounts/incentives can be considered as a separate consideration against any services supplied by such distributors. 2. At the outset please note that the tax […]
Utility for compliance of Rule 36(4) – This utility is prepared in view of notification regarding new rule 36(4) and circular no. 123 to determined maximum ITC (B2B) that can be availed while filing GSTR 3B. As per the new rule 36(4) inserted vide Notification No. 49/2019 dated 09th October 2019, a taxpayer can claim […]
The Hon’ble HC, Jharkhand in the matter of Shree Nanak Ferro Alloys Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India [W.P.(T) No. 2246 of 2019 dated December 18, 2019] directed the Petitioner to deposit the amount of Rs. 41,98,642/-, under the Integrated Goods and Service Tax (“IGST”) head, towards the liability of September, 2017 and quashed the […]
In this article, An attempt has been made to simplify GST liability on services related to Intellectual Property rights. What is Intellectual Property Right:- The term ‘Intellectual Property Right’ (IPR) has not been defined in GST Law. MF(DR) circular No. B2/8/2004-TRU dated 10-9-2004 states as follows – Intellectual property emerges from application of intellect, which […]
As you are aware, Rule 36(4) of the CGST Rules 2017 notified w.e.f. 09.10.2019, restricts availment of credit to 120% of the eligible credit based on invoices/debit notes uploaded by the supplier in their GSTR-1. From 1st January 2020, the eligibility has got reduced to 110% of such eligible credit.
