To facilitate foreign investment into the country a number of steps have been taken by Government of India in the past. Setting up an Authority for Advance Rulings (Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax) to give binding rulings, in advance, on Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax matters pertaining to an investment venture in India is one such measure. The legal provisions of Advance Rulings were introduced through the Finance Acts of 1998, 1999 and 2003.
Income Tax : Learn who can apply for an advance ruling, applicable fees, withdrawal rules, and its binding effect under the Income-tax Act. The...
Income Tax : The article explains who can apply for Advance Rulings, the transactions covered, applicable forms, fees, procedures, and appeal r...
Income Tax : Only specified applicants such as non-residents, certain residents, and public sector companies can apply. The ruling clarifies ta...
Goods and Services Tax : The authority held that oxygen supply through installed infrastructure is a composite supply of goods. The key takeaway is that pr...
Income Tax : Understand when and how to file an advance ruling application under the Income-tax Act, 2025. The update clarifies eligibility, do...
Income Tax : From October 2024, applicants can withdraw advance ruling requests pending with the Board for Advance Rulings by October 31. Final...
Income Tax : This handbook aims to provide general guidance on the scheme of Advance Rulings under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act). I...
Income Tax : CBDT launches Boards for Advance Rulings in Delhi & Mumbai, providing tax clarity to investors and entities. Learn more about this...
Goods and Services Tax : New functionality to search for GST Advance Ruling Orders issued by Authority / Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling on GST Por...
Goods and Services Tax : Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) constituted under the provisions of a SGST/ UTGST Act, in terms of the provisions of Section 96...
Goods and Services Tax : Odisha AAR held CAMPA deposits for forest clearance are consideration for Government services, not exempt from GST, and taxable un...
Goods and Services Tax : Odisha AAR held that questions relating to refund of accumulated ITC under Section 54(3) are not maintainable under the advance ru...
Custom Duty : CAAR classified complete prosthetic joints as artificial joints and held the imported implants ineligible for exemption under Noti...
Custom Duty : CAAR held ITC (HS) code matching is not mandatory for DFIA imports if goods match DFIA description and satisfy Notification 25/202...
Custom Duty : CAAR ruled that matching ITC (HS) codes is unnecessary if imported goods match the DFIA description and comply with quantity and v...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the constitution & members of the Advance Ruling Authority under Maharashtra VAT Act 2002. Detailed analysis on its implic...
Goods and Services Tax : Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Authority makes changes in its lineup, appointing Shri. Ajaykumar Vaman Bonde as a member of Ad...
Income Tax : CBDT notifies e-advance rulings (Amendment) Scheme, 2023 which amend e-advance rulings Scheme, 2022. Amendments are related to Boa...
Goods and Services Tax : The Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, has issued Notification No. 02/2023 – Union Territory Tax on May 25, 2023. T...
Income Tax : F No. 189/3/2022-ITA-I Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue (Central Board of Direct Taxes) North Block, ...
In re Rotex Fabric Pvt.Ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) Question.1 Whether the product Non Woven Bags manufactured through the intermediate product Non Woven fabric classifiable under Heading No. 5603 are properly classifiable under Heading No. 6305 or under Heading No. 3923? Ans. The product Non Woven Bags manufactured through the intermediate product Non Woven plastic material […]
In re Posiedon Hydro Infratech (GST AAR Gujarat) On going through the question on advance ruling sought by the applicant at (1) above, we find that the same is not related to the agreement made by them with M/S. WAPCOS or the agreement made between M/s. WAPCOS and M/s. SSNNL but is related to the […]
In re Shree Arbuda Transport (GST AAR Gujarat) Question-1: If we want to provide all above services for a ‘Single consolidated Rate’ as a package, whether such supply would be treated as ‘Mixed supply’ as per the provisions of Section 2(74) of the CGST Act, 2017, since the services are not naturally bundled and are […]
In re Swaminarayan Foods Pvt.Ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) Question: Whether any tax is payable in respect of sale of Fryums manufactured by the applicant? And if the answer is in the affirmative, the rate of tax thereof? Answer : The product ‘Fried Fryums’ manufactured and supplied by applicant is classifiable under Tariff Item 2106 90 […]
In re Shukla Ashar Impex Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) The product i.e. ‘AAYUDH-MOSX’, is a mosquito repellent and hence, it is classifiable under Chapter Heading No. 3808 91 91 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1985, attracting GST @18% (CGST-9%+ SGST-9%). FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF APPELLATE AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING,GUJARAT B R I E F FA […]
In re Shivam Agro Industries (GST AAR Gujarat) Question 1: Whether the product ‘Zn EDTA’ (Zinc Ethylenediamine Tetra Acetic Acid) and ‘Fe EDTA’ (Iron Ethylenediamine Tetra Acetic Acid) Acetic Acid) being supplied by the applicant are classifiable under Chapter Heading 2833, 2921, 3105 or 3808 or any other Chapter Heading of the Customs Tariff Act, […]
In re J K Snacks Industries (GST AAR Gujarat) Question 1: Under which Tariff Heading, the product dealt in by the applicant, i.e. PAPAD of different shapes and sizes are eligible to be classified? Answer: The product of different shape and sizes manufactured and supplied by applicant is “un-fried FRYUMS” and not “Papad” and is […]
In re J K Papad Industries (GST AAR Gujarat) Question 1: Under which Tariff Heading, the product dealt in by the applicant, i.e. PAPAD of different shapes and sizes are eligible to be classified? Answer: The product of different shape and sizes manufactured and supplied by applicant is “un-fried FRYUMS” and not “Papad” and is […]
In re J K Food Industries (GST AAR Gujarat) Question 1: Under which Tariff Heading, the product dealt in by the applicant, i.e. PAPAD of different shapes and sizes are eligible to be classified? Answer: The product of different shape and sizes manufactured and supplied by applicant is “un-fried FRYUMS” and not “Papad” and is […]
In re D.M. Net Technologies (Isha Chirag Patel) (GST AAR Gujarat) Question: Whether the services provided by the applicant in affiliation to/ partnered with Gujarat University and providing education for degree courses to students under specific curriculum as approved by the Gujrat University, for which degrees are awarded by the Gujarat University are exempt from […]
