To facilitate foreign investment into the country a number of steps have been taken by Government of India in the past. Setting up an Authority for Advance Rulings (Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax) to give binding rulings, in advance, on Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax matters pertaining to an investment venture in India is one such measure. The legal provisions of Advance Rulings were introduced through the Finance Acts of 1998, 1999 and 2003.
Income Tax : Only specified applicants such as non-residents, certain residents, and public sector companies can apply. The ruling clarifies ta...
Goods and Services Tax : The authority held that oxygen supply through installed infrastructure is a composite supply of goods. The key takeaway is that pr...
Income Tax : Understand when and how to file an advance ruling application under the Income-tax Act, 2025. The update clarifies eligibility, do...
Goods and Services Tax : Recent AAR rulings have raised questions on whether ITC on imports is subject to Section 16(4). While one ruling applies the time ...
Goods and Services Tax : The issue was whether foreign patent filing fees attract GST. The ruling confirms such payments are taxable as import of services ...
Income Tax : From October 2024, applicants can withdraw advance ruling requests pending with the Board for Advance Rulings by October 31. Final...
Income Tax : This handbook aims to provide general guidance on the scheme of Advance Rulings under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act). I...
Income Tax : CBDT launches Boards for Advance Rulings in Delhi & Mumbai, providing tax clarity to investors and entities. Learn more about this...
Goods and Services Tax : New functionality to search for GST Advance Ruling Orders issued by Authority / Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling on GST Por...
Goods and Services Tax : Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) constituted under the provisions of a SGST/ UTGST Act, in terms of the provisions of Section 96...
Goods and Services Tax : The Kerala AAR held that advance ruling applications cannot be based on hypothetical scenarios or academic questions. The Authorit...
Goods and Services Tax : The Kerala AAR held that medicines, consumables, room rent, and ancillary services provided during inpatient treatment form part o...
Goods and Services Tax : Kerala AAR held that used gunny bags sold after cattle feed manufacturing are reusable packing bags under HSN 6305 and not scrap. ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Kerala AAR rejected an advance ruling application after noting that the issue of GST applicability on member transactions had ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Authority ruled that the President and Members of the statutory temple board are not “directors” under GST notifications. ...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the constitution & members of the Advance Ruling Authority under Maharashtra VAT Act 2002. Detailed analysis on its implic...
Goods and Services Tax : Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Authority makes changes in its lineup, appointing Shri. Ajaykumar Vaman Bonde as a member of Ad...
Income Tax : CBDT notifies e-advance rulings (Amendment) Scheme, 2023 which amend e-advance rulings Scheme, 2022. Amendments are related to Boa...
Goods and Services Tax : The Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, has issued Notification No. 02/2023 – Union Territory Tax on May 25, 2023. T...
Income Tax : F No. 189/3/2022-ITA-I Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue (Central Board of Direct Taxes) North Block, ...
In re Dlecta Foods Pvt Ltd. (GST AAR Maharashtra) Whether the product ‘Non-Dairy Cream’ manufactured by the Applicant is covered under CH 1517 90 90 or under CH 2106 90 99 of the GST Tariff? Subject classification matter is pending as a dispute in proceedings initiated by the Directorate General GST Intelligence (DGGI), Pune Regional […]
India ITME Society should refund the amount to their customer members with GST and the society should either get tax refund or deduct the amount of GST paid on such transaction from their future tax obligation without any time constraints mentioned in Section 34 of CGST Act 2017.
In re Lonza India Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) The Application in GST ARA Form No. 01 of M/s. Lonza India Private Limited, vide reference ARA No. 23 Dated 07.09.2020 is disposed of, as being withdrawn voluntarily and unconditionally. FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA The present application has been […]
ARA, Rajasthan has pronounced judgment on 15.9.2021, in the case of Harish Chand Modi (2021) 36 J. K. Jain’s GST & VR 500, that; ‘The Principal supply of services by the applicant (Lessor) is ‘Renting/Leasing of immovable property’, attracting GST @18% under SAC code 997212. Collection of electricity & other expenses by the Lessor for […]
It is evident that an applicant can seek an Advance Ruling only in relation to supply of goods or services or both undertaken or proposed to be undertaken by them. Accordingly, the question on tax liability under reverse charge mechanism is not liable for admission before the authority of advance ruling.
In re Golkonda Hotels And Resorts Limited (GST AAR Telangana) M/s. Golconda Hospitality Services and Resorts Limited, are in the business of providing accommodation and services and in the course of the business they have supplied the services of boarding and lodging facility for the officials of Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation for conducting 2018 General […]
In re U.R. Rao Satellite Centre (GST AAR Karnataka) Applicant raised the issue of Applicability of GST on Insurance premium paid towards launch services and Applicability of MoF Notification No. 09/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated: 28-06-2017. On hearing AAr observed that we observe that M/s. U.R. Rao Satellite Centre, who have filed the application, is not […]
The issue raised in the instant application and the audit objection raised in the audit report are one and the same i.e., applicability of GST on security deposit. Thus first proviso to Section 98(2) of the CGST Act 2017 is squarely applicable to the instant case, as all the conditions therein are fulfilled.
In re Madhus Tyre Care (GST AAR Karnataka) In this Advance ruling assesse asked Whether the tax invoice proposed to be issued by the assesse satisfies section 31 of GST Act?, Whether the tax invoice proposed to be issued by the assesse satisfies Rule 46 of GST Rules? and Whether the total amount (inclusive of […]
In re Chikkaveeranna Sweet Stall (GST AAR Karnataka) For composition tax payers what is the applicable rate of GST for the manufacturing of sweet and namkins and selling the goods over the counter not having any facility of restaurant or hotel or not a part thereof and not giving for human consumption at the place […]
