Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Iwi Crogenic Vaporization System India Vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax- VADODARA (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : ST/13070/2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/06/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

 Brief of the case:

The CESTAT Ahmedabad in the case of Iwi Crogenic Vaporization System India held that The non-payment of recovered tax coupled with the fact of non-furnishing of the details in respect of unpaid part in periodical returns clearly establish the intention of assesse to evade the payment of service tax recovered. Therefore, in such a case penalty levied u/s 78 is sustainable in law.
Facts of the case:

During the course of investigation by the central excise officers it was found that the assessee company was not paying service tax on certain services as payable under Reverse charge mechanism. Accordingly a demand of Rs .34,06,598/- along with interest under sec 75 and also equivalent penalty u/s 78.

The entire service tax along with interest was paid before the issue of show cause notice(SCN). Therefore, the assessee contested the penalty levied that the non-payment was accepted and paid before issue of SCN.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031