Case Law Details
Case Name : M/s. Joy Foam Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Madras High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Brief of the case:
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of M/s Joy Foam P. Ltd held that the input credit of inputs need not to be reversed even in case the payment of duty has been ordered to be remitted under Rule 49 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. It is why because neither such reversal is a pre-condition for remission nor the remission can be considered as exemption.
Facts of the case:
- A fire broke out it i
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Author Bio
Yes, You have to reverse the credit availed.
Shri Ajay,
If your claim with insurance is settled along with cenvat duty, then you have to pay back the duty to the government and you can take back the cenvat credit reversed by you on inputs that contained in the finished product destroyed.
S.Maheswaran.
Rule 3(5C) also requires reversal of CENVAT on input services by virtue of amendment made by N/N 012014-CE (N.T.)
Dear Sir,
last year we have filled application for remission of duty on destroyed finished goods and reversed cenvat credit on inputs which was use for manufacture the same.
Same time we filed insurance claim for Value including cenvat duty , and Insurance claim approved with cenvat duty
(We have insured stock with value including all taxes )
But department object that, if you have received the cenvat duty from insurance company by way of claim , then you have availed double benefit.
Matter is on hold by dept.
Kindly give your view on this