Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Spa constructions Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Spa constructions Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

ITAT Hyderabad: Capital Introduced by Partners Not Taxable in Firm—If at All Taxable, It Must Be Assessed in the Partner’s Hands

The Tribunal examined the addition of Rs.3,26,91,139/- under section 69A r.w.s. 115BBE made on account of “capital introduced by partners.” Upon evaluating the registered sale deeds, partners’ capital accounts, and bank statements, it was found that substantial payments towards purchase of land from Smt. D. Poojitha were directly made by the partners and duly credited through jour

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

Experienced professional with over 3 years of Post qualification experience in handling Assessments, dealing CIT(A) and ITAT Appeals. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

JDA Not a Transfer Without Consideration & Possession : Capital Gains Addition Deleted ₹3.49 Cr Addition Deleted as Demonetisation Cash Deposits Matched Recorded Sales Reassessment Quashed Due to Unsigned 143(2) Notice: Mandatory Signature Requirement Ignored ITAT Pune: ₹1.62 Cr u/s 68 Deleted — No “Source of Source” Needed Pre-01.04.2023 Reopening Quashed as Original Reason for 147 Fails – No Other Additions Can Survive View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031