Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Transfer Pricing Case Analysis on Inclusion / Exclusion of comparables

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2019 taxguru.in 714
Case Name
Beam Global Spirits & Wine (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2008-09
Advertisement


Beam Global Spirits & Wine (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT (ITAT Delhi)

Brief of assessee’s facts:

1. Beam India (the assessee), a wholly owned subsidiary of Beam USA, was engaged in the production and sale of alcoholic beverages in India.

2. During AY 2008-09, the assessee entered following ITs with its AE along with outcome of TPO Order:

International Transaction  Amount in INR  Outcome of TP Order 
Purchase of compound Alcoholic Preparation 14,35,47,473 Accepted
Provision of Marketing support services (‘MSS’) 1,28,11,244 Disputed
Reimbursement of expenses 17,69,26,002 Accepted

3. Under the MSS segment, the assessee was providing marketing support services to JBB U.S to promote the duty-free sales of international brands of liquor products of JBB U.S.

4. Beam India also incurred certain advertising and brand promotion expenses which were reimbursed by JBB, U.S to the assessee on cost-to-cost basis without any mark-up. Basically such expenses were in the nature of pass through expenses.

5. TPO rejected the assessee’s economic analysis and proposed TP adjustment to the tune of Rs. 60,77,920.

 Ld. TPO’s decision:

1. TPO completed the transfer pricing assessment and thereby:

a. rejected the economic analysis of the assessee;

b. undertook a fresh search using arbitrary quantitative and qualitative filters ;

c. considering AMP expenses while determining OPM of the assessee due to the very reason that such expenses fall within the scope of expenditure incurred for services; and

d. proposed an adjustment of Rs. 60,77,920/- to the income of the assessee.

 Hon’ble DRP’s decision:

1. Directed the exclusion of following two companies from the comparables selected by the Ld. TPO:

a. Vapi Waste Management; and

b. Effluent Management Co & Rites Ltd.

 Issue to be decided:

1. Aggrieved, the assessee filed an appeal before Hon’ble tribunal and challenged following comparables regarding their inclusion or exclusion:

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Reetika Agarwal
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Location: Delhi, Delhi
Articles Published: 40

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.