Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sapphire Foods India Limited Vs OSD TDS (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sapphire Foods India Limited Vs OSD TDS (ITAT Mumbai) Assessee, operating KFC & Pizza Hut restaurants, was treated as an assessee-in-default u/s 201(1) & 201(1A) for not deducting TDS on year-end provisions of ₹5.70 crore towards rent, contractors, professional & technical charges, etc. The AO raised a total demand of ₹64.51 lakh, holding that TDS should have been deducted even on year-end accruals. Assessee argued that: Payees were not identifiable at year-end. 30% of such expenses were disallowed suo motu u/s 40(a)(ia) in the return. TDS was deducted & deposited in the s...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930