Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Madho Bihari Agrawal Vs ACIT (ITAT Indore)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Madho Bihari Agrawal Vs ACIT (ITAT Indore) TDS Compliance ≠ Expenditure – ITAT Indore Deletes ₹1.46 Cr Addition Made via Section 154 Rectification; ITAT Indore: Addition Under Section 69C Deleted as Commission Was Not Assessee’s Own Expense; ITAT: No Unexplained Expenditure When Commission Paid for Clients, Not from Assessee’s Own Business; Section 69C Inapplicable Where Commission Is Not Debited in Assessee’s Books, Rules ITAT Indore; ITAT Indore Quashes ₹1.46 Crore Addition: Mere TDS Disclosure in Form 3CD Doesn’t Prove Unrecorded Expense; ITAT Clarifies: TDS on Commission Do...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031