Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Hyderabad Yadgiri Tollway Private Limited Vs PCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Hyderabad Yadgiri Tollway Private Limited Vs PCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) Forex Loss Claimed in One Go Invalid – AO’s Lapse Invites 263 Revision – ITAT Ahmedabad Upholds PCIT’s Action; ITAT Upholds 263: AO Failed to Enforce ICDS-VI on Foreign Exchange Loss; Exchange Loss Accounting: Claim Must Be Annual, Not Cumulative on Loan Repayment; PCIT Intervention Justified: AO’s Lack of Inquiry on Forex Loss Claim. The assessee, an SPV executing the Hyderabad–Yadgiri highway project under NHAI, filed return declaring a loss of ₹37.84 crore. PCIT invoked section 263, finding that the AO w...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031