Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Gaurav Investments (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Gaurav Investments (ITAT Mumbai) Tolerance band of 10% under Section 43CA held retrospective – Beneficial amendment applies to all years – Tribunal upholds CIT(A) deletion of ₹2.22 Cr addition- No addition if DVO value within 10% – ITAT Mumbai confirms retrospective safe-harbour relief Revenue filed appeal against the order of CIT(A) deleting addition made u/s 43CA on account of difference between sale consideration & stamp duty value of immovable properties. The only issue before Tribunal was whether the amended tolerance limit of 10% introduced by Finance Act, 2020 could...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Excess Stock in Survey = Business Income, Not 115BBE Hit – ITAT Pune Draws Clear Line No Specific Charge = No Penalty – ITAT Deletes 270A Penalty for Vague Notice Bonafide Claim Updated Return Can’t Kill Genuine Exemption – ITAT Allows Section 11 Relief Despite Delay Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031